Panzer Grenadier Battles on December 22nd:
Battle of the Bulge #42 - Trapped! Elsenborn Revised #10 - Elsenborn Ridge
Battle of the Bulge #43 - Ettelbruck Elsenborn Ridge #25 - Elsenborn Ridge
Battle of the Bulge #44 - Martelange and Warnach Winter Soldiers #8 - One Last Attempt
Conquest of Ethiopia #11 - Blood on Amba Tzellere Winter Soldiers #9 - What really Happened at Les Tscheous?
PG-HQ Library - Panzer Grenadier Hall > Scenarios > STks002
Errors? Omissions? Report them!
Sledgehammer of the Proletariat
Stalin's Tanks #2
(Defender) Germany vs Soviet Union (Attacker)
Formations Involved
Germany 22nd Panzer Division
Germany 40th Infantry Division
Soviet Union 32nd Tank Corps
Soviet Union 400th Rifle Division
Display
Balance:
Overall balance chart for STks002
Total
Side 1 0
Draw 0
Side 2 0
Overall Rating, 0 votes
5
4
3
2
1
0
Scenario Rank: --- of 940
Parent Game Stalin's Tanks
Historicity Alt-History
Date 1943-07-07
Start Time 08:00
Turn Count 26
Visibility Day
Counters 175
Net Morale 1
Net Initiative 1
Maps 2: 42, 43
Layout Dimensions 56 x 43 cm
22 x 17 in
Play Bounty 261
AAR Bounty 227
Total Plays 0
Total AARs 0
Battle Types
Inflict Enemy Casualties
Road Control
Urban Assault
Conditions
Entrenchments
Minefields
Off-board Artillery
Randomly-drawn Aircraft
Reinforcements
Scenario Requirements & Playability
Burning Tigers Maps + Counters
Stalin's Tanks Base Game
Introduction

The T34/76 represented an admirable balance of speed, firepower, and protection. The T34/57 variant tilted strongly toward the anti-armor role, enough so that it lacked the same ability as the T34/76 to attack enemy infantry and fortifications. For that role, it would be accompanied into battle by a dedicated close-support version, the T34/95
Conclusion

The Exterminator had been maximized to fight enemy tanks; against enemy infantry, it would have relied on its boon companion, the T34/95, to clear a path. The Red Army ended up relying on the various models of the 76.2mm gun to engage both armored and unarmored targets. The Red Army had built what it called "artillery tanks" in the KV and BT series, so a T34 with 95mm gun would not have been a stretch
Display Relevant AFV Rules
AFV Rules Pertaining to this Scenario's Order of Battle
  • Vulnerable to results on the Assault Combat Chart (7.25, 7.63, ACC), and may be attacked by Anti-Tank fire (11.2, DFT). Anti-Tank fire only affects the individual unit fired upon (7.62, 11.0).
  • AFV's are activated by tank leaders (3.2, 3.3, 5.42, 6.8). They may also be activated as part of an initial activating stack, but if activated in this way would need a tank leader in order to carry out combat movement.
  • AFV's do not block Direct Fire (10.1).
  • Full-strength AFV's with "armor efficiency" may make two anti-tank (AT) fire attacks per turn (either in their action segment or during opportunity fire) if they have AT fire values of 0 or more (11.2).
  • Each unit with an AT fire value of 2 or more may fire at targets at a distance of between 100% and 150% of its printed AT range. It does so at half its AT fire value. (11.3)
  • Efficient and non-efficient AFV's may conduct two opportunity fires per turn if using direct fire (7.44, 7.64). Units with both Direct and AT Fire values may use either type of fire in the same turn as their opportunity fire, but not both (7.22, 13.0). Units which can take opportunity fire twice per turn do not have to target the same unit both times (13.0).
  • Demoralized AFV's are not required to flee from units that do not have AT fire values (14.3).
  • Place a Wreck marker when an AFV is eliminated in a bridge or town hex (16.3).
  • AFV's do not benefit from Entrenchments (16.42).
  • AFV's may Dig In (16.2).
  • Open-top AFV's: Immune to M, M1 and M2 results on Direct and Bombardment Fire Tables, but DO take step losses from X and #X results (7.25, 7.41, 7.61, BT, DFT). If a "2X" or "3X" result is rolled, at least one of the step losses must be taken by an open-top AFV if present.
  • Closed-top AFV's: Immune to M, M1 and M2 results on Direct and Bombardment Fire Tables. Do not take step losses from Direct or Bombardment Fire. If X or #X result on Fire Table, make M morale check instead (7.25, 7.41, 7.61, BT, DFT).
  • Closed-top AFV's: Provide the +1 modifier on the Assault Table when combined with infantry. (Modifier only applies to Germans in all scenarios; Soviet Guards in scenarios taking place after 1942; Polish, US and Commonwealth in scenarios taking place after 1943.) (ACC)
  • Tank: all are closed-top and provide the +1 Assault bonus, when applicable
  • APC – Armored Personnel Carrier: These are Combat Units, but stack like Transports. They can transport personnel units or towed units. They are not counted as combat units for the +1 stacking modifier on the Direct Fire and Bombardment Tables (4.4). They may be activated by regular leaders and tank leaders (1.2, 3.34, 4.3, 5.43). They do not provide the +1 Assault bonus (ACC).
  • Prime Movers: Transports which only transport towed units and/or leaders (May not carry personnel units). May or may not be armored (armored models are open-top). All are mechanized. (SB)
Display Order of Battle
Germany Order of Battle
Heer
Soviet Union Order of Battle
Army (RKKA)
  • Motorized
Display Errata (6)
6 Errata Items
Overall balance chart for 20

The reduced direct fire value of the Heer HMG became 5-5 starting with Fall of France.

(plloyd1010 on 2015 Jul 31)
Overall balance chart for 63

The morale and combat modifiers of German Sergeant #1614 should be "0", not "8".

(Shad on 2010 Dec 15)
Overall balance chart for 47

All SPW 251s have an armor value of 0.

(Shad on 2010 Dec 15)
Overall balance chart for 54

The movement allowance on the counters in Airborne is misprinted. It should be "3."

(rerathbun on 2012 Jan 30)
Overall balance chart for 951

The reduced direct fire value in Kursk: Burning Tigers is 4-4.

(plloyd1010 on 2015 Jul 31)
Overall balance chart for 993

Kommissars never get morale or combat modifiers. Ignore misprints.

(Shad on 2010 Dec 15)
PG-HQ Library - Panzer Grenadier Hall > Scenarios > STks002
Errors? Omissions? Report them!
Page generated in 0.212 seconds.