Holy Vilnius Iron Wolves #3 |
||
---|---|---|
(Attacker) Lithuania | vs | Poland (Defender) |
Formations Involved | ||
---|---|---|
Lithuania | 2nd Infantry Division | |
Poland | 1st Legion "Pilsudshk's" Infantry Division |
|
Overall Rating, 2 votes |
---|
4
|
Scenario Rank: --- of 940 |
Parent Game | Iron Wolves |
---|---|
Historicity | Alt-History |
Date | 1939-11-01 |
Start Time | 07:00 |
Turn Count | 30 |
Visibility | Day |
Counters | 119 |
Net Morale | 1 |
Net Initiative | 0 |
Maps | 4: 15, 17, 18, 6 |
Layout Dimensions | 86 x 56 cm 34 x 22 in |
Play Bounty | 185 |
AAR Bounty | 171 |
Total Plays | 2 |
Total AARs | 1 |
Battle Types |
---|
Urban Assault |
Conditions |
---|
Off-board Artillery |
Randomly-drawn Aircraft |
Scenario Requirements & Playability | |
---|---|
Eastern Front | Maps + Counters |
Iron Wolves | Base Game |
Road to Berlin | Maps |
White Eagles | Counters |
Introduction |
---|
Despite fighting together against the Reds in their first years of independence, friendship between Poland and Lithuania proved impossible once Poland seized Lithuania's ancient capital, Vilnius, in 1922. In 1939, the Germans urged Lithuania to join them in their attack on Poland and regain Vilnius. Many in the army and government wanted to follow through. |
Conclusion |
---|
Lithuania's refusal to assault Vilnius in September 1939 spared them from having to face the 1st Infantry Division, Pilsudski's Legion, one of the toughest units in the Polish army. At the end of September the Germans made a deal with the Soviets placing Lithuania in the Soviet sphere of influence, and the Soviets allowed them to occupy Vilnius unopposed on 9 October. They would not enjoy their conquest for long. |
AFV Rules Pertaining to this Scenario's Order of Battle |
---|
|
Pole-Axed |
---|
This one pits two battalions of Poles of high quality against an entire regiment of Lithuanians of normal quality with significant, though primarily poor quality armor support. The Lithunians are trying to open up two roads leading to Vilnius without decimating themselves in the process The Poles set up in two company sections, 1 guarding each of the roads and 1 centrally located to support either road. Given their available artillery, they ceded the entry boards completely leaving a significant open space for the Lithuanians to cross prior to contact. This worked to perfection. The Lithuanians put their major effort in the north, sending two battalions and 80% of their armor. They ultimately did clear off the road but their losses due to the artillery and the opportunity fire as they closed in were significant. The Poles could count and knew that they had a large lead in losses and had inflicted more than the 20 steps necessary to get a minor victory and therefore did not commit their reserves at all. It was interesting, however, as the possibility of a major victory loomed if the Poles did commit their reserves, but the losses to be incurred were so substantial as to inhibit the move. That tension was felt throughout the play. For the Lithuanians to win they have to keep their entire force concentrated and should probably focus on the northern road, given the lack of towns there. It will be very difficult to get the Poles destroyed and clear of the road while having a lighter loss. Remember, no combined arms for the Lithuanian armor. Overall, a reasonably large scale scenario with critical choices for both players. Highly recommended. A note, however, about "victory" conditions. In this circumstance, if the goal was to open the road to Vilnius it is clear that the Lithuanians won. The ONLY reason that the Poles did not attack to close down the road was that it would have endangered their current easy "victory" by opening their reserves up to losses from artillery (by the way, I did not use the swamp terrain for the Polish defense, something you should not overlook). If this was a real situation one would have expected the Lithuanians to turn and establish a strong defense, perhaps by using the third battalion as a trailer, and the Poles to launch a nasty counterattack. A long time ago in a very quirky design (The Struggle of Nations, the 1813 campaign in Germany) Kevin Zucker wrote a remarkably strong comment about victory conditions. While the game is in my attic and I don't want to invest the energy to go get it, the comment was basically that only a scoundrel would fail to realize that they have lost. In this case, although, the Poles "won" they cannot be satisfied and although the Lithuanians "lost" they have far more options concerning the ultimate strategic goal, capture of Vilnius and can feel pleased with their efforts. |
0 Comments |