Panzer Grenadier Battles on November 21st:
Desert Rats #16 - The Panzers Pull Back Desert Rats #19 - The Panzers Return
Desert Rats #17 - The Tomb Of Sidi Rezegh Jungle Fighting #7 - Line Of Departure
Desert Rats #18 - A Pibroch's Skirl South Africa's War #5 - Irish Eyes
Errors? Omissions? Report them!
Open Sights
Edelweiss: Expanded #2
(Defender) Australia
(Defender) New Zealand
vs Germany (Attacker)
Formations Involved
Australia 16th Infantry Brigade
Germany 2nd "Vienna" Panzer Division
Germany 6th Gebirgs Division
New Zealand 6th Infantry Brigade
Display
Balance:



Overall balance chart for EdlX002
Total
Side 1 0
Draw 0
Side 2 3
Overall Rating, 3 votes
5
4
3
2
1
4.33
Scenario Rank: --- of 940
Parent Game Edelweiss: Expanded
Historicity Historical
Date 1941-04-18
Start Time 14:30
Turn Count 24
Visibility Day
Counters 81
Net Morale 1
Net Initiative 3
Maps 4: 14, 16, 18, 5
Layout Dimensions 112 x 43 cm
44 x 17 in
Play Bounty 166
AAR Bounty 171
Total Plays 3
Total AARs 1
Battle Types
Exit the Battle Area
Rural Assault
Conditions
Randomly-drawn Aircraft
Scenario Requirements & Playability
Afrika Korps Counters
Desert Rats Counters
Edelweiss: Expanded Base Game
Eastern Front Maps
Road to Berlin Maps
Introduction

Having forced the Pinios River, 6th Mountain Division pressed the retreating ANZACs along with 2nd "Vienna" Panzer Division. Chaos followed, with the Australian and New Zealand units becoming tangled and contradictory orders flowing from brigade, division, corps and expedition headquarters. Near the town of Larissa, the 4th New Zealand Field Regiment - without orders - turned to offer battle and cover the retreat with its 25-pounders.

Conclusion

Maj. R.H. Dyson's Kiwi gunners conducted a fight retreat, leapfrogging their batteries steadily backwards while the infantry made their panic-stricken way to safety and shamed anti-tank crews added their firepower to the gun line. "The officer stood out in the open directing the fire, the crews crouched behind the shields and fed and fired the guns while everything the enemy had was being pelted at them," an Australian infantryman recalled later. "They looked like a drawing by someone who had never been to a war, but the whole thing was unreal."

Additional Notes

New Zealand uses 3x 25-pdr (British)


Display Relevant AFV Rules

AFV Rules Pertaining to this Scenario's Order of Battle
  • Vulnerable to results on the Assault Combat Chart (7.25, 7.63, ACC), and may be attacked by Anti-Tank fire (11.2, DFT). Anti-Tank fire only affects the individual unit fired upon (7.62, 11.0).
  • AFV's are activated by tank leaders (3.2, 3.3, 5.42, 6.8). They may also be activated as part of an initial activating stack, but if activated in this way would need a tank leader in order to carry out combat movement.
  • AFV's do not block Direct Fire (10.1).
  • Full-strength AFV's with "armor efficiency" may make two anti-tank (AT) fire attacks per turn (either in their action segment or during opportunity fire) if they have AT fire values of 0 or more (11.2).
  • Each unit with an AT fire value of 2 or more may fire at targets at a distance of between 100% and 150% of its printed AT range. It does so at half its AT fire value. (11.3)
  • Efficient and non-efficient AFV's may conduct two opportunity fires per turn if using direct fire (7.44, 7.64). Units with both Direct and AT Fire values may use either type of fire in the same turn as their opportunity fire, but not both (7.22, 13.0). Units which can take opportunity fire twice per turn do not have to target the same unit both times (13.0).
  • Demoralized AFV's are not required to flee from units that do not have AT fire values (14.3).
  • Place a Wreck marker when an AFV is eliminated in a bridge or town hex (16.3).
  • AFV's do not benefit from Entrenchments (16.42).
  • AFV's may Dig In (16.2).
  • Open-top AFV's: Immune to M, M1 and M2 results on Direct and Bombardment Fire Tables, but DO take step losses from X and #X results (7.25, 7.41, 7.61, BT, DFT). If a "2X" or "3X" result is rolled, at least one of the step losses must be taken by an open-top AFV if present.
  • Closed-top AFV's: Immune to M, M1 and M2 results on Direct and Bombardment Fire Tables. Do not take step losses from Direct or Bombardment Fire. If X or #X result on Fire Table, make M morale check instead (7.25, 7.41, 7.61, BT, DFT).
  • Closed-top AFV's: Provide the +1 modifier on the Assault Table when combined with infantry. (Modifier only applies to Germans in all scenarios; Soviet Guards in scenarios taking place after 1942; Polish, US and Commonwealth in scenarios taking place after 1943.) (ACC)
  • Tank: all are closed-top and provide the +1 Assault bonus, when applicable
  • APC – Armored Personnel Carrier: These are Combat Units, but stack like Transports. They can transport personnel units or towed units. They are not counted as combat units for the +1 stacking modifier on the Direct Fire and Bombardment Tables (4.4). They may be activated by regular leaders and tank leaders (1.2, 3.34, 4.3, 5.43). They do not provide the +1 Assault bonus (ACC).

Display Order of Battle

Australia Order of Battle
Army
  • Towed
Germany Order of Battle
Heer
New Zealand Order of Battle
New Zealand Army
  • Mechanized
  • Motorized
  • Towed

Display Errata (2)

2 Errata Items
Scen 2

Use British 25 pounders for the New Zealand units

(mike perryman on 2010 Dec 29)
Overall balance chart for 486

The Pz IVe appearing in the original Panzer Grenadier game had an Anti tank value of 4-7. As of Afrika Korps (2002), continuing onward through the 3rd and 4th edition games, the anti tank value has been 4-4.

(plloyd1010 on 2016 Jul 25)

Display AARs (1)

Edelweiss, scenario #2: Open Sights
Author JayTownsend
Method Solo
Victor Germany
Play Date 2012-02-25
Language English
Scenario EdlX002

Greece!

When you dig deep into the PG scenarios, you can find some interesting locations you didn’t think PG had and some unique situations that are not the normal scenario and this is one of them! I always wanted to play a PG scenario in Greece 1940-41 and this one takes us back to April 18th 1941. The German 6th Mountain Division and the 2nd Panzer Division with a morale of 8/7 are advancing and with air-support while Elements of the 6th New Zealand Brigade and the 16th Australian Brigade with a morale of 7/5 are in a disordered retreat only held together by the 4th new Zealand Field Regiment of 25-pounder artillery units with a morale of 9/8.

Both the ANZAC (Allies) setup on mostly on the two eastern maps out of four maps, with four dice rolled to determine how many ANZACs started in a disrupted state and both sides taking turning choosing which ANZAC units start disrupted. Both sides are rushing to exit off the western edge of the four maps, with points received for each step exited. The ANZAC retreating off the far map and the Germans advancing off the same far map! Both sides also receive points for eliminated steps and the New Zealand 25-pounders and the German Armor steps counting double. Also some scenario in PG have point losses for Leaders and Trucks, in this one the Truck steps do count and for victory points as well, which is always interesting in changing the mindset for this scenario about trucks. The Germans also have a heavy air presence with aircraft showing up every turn. The randomness of this scenario as far as setup and how many units start disrupted makes this scenario a great one for replays. The Allies can only have one unit per hex in the initial setup. Lastly, the Germans enter from the eastern side of the map.

The Allies had to setup at least 10 units on maps 14 & 5 and after the disrupting dice rolls and back and forth decisions on which units start in this state, about half were on both maps, with one of those units being a leader counter. The Germans Rolled on the map number 14 and until now, I didn’t realize the German MTN HMGs have the same movement factor of 3 as the infantry. The Allies are trying to rally all the disrupted troops, setup a blocking force and decide which troops to continue retreating and when. Two of the 25-pounders setup in forward positions to buy their other units more time, to either rally, setup defensive positions or retreat. The third 25-pounder unit is allowed to setup on map 16, three maps back. Remembering that disrupted units adjacent to the 25-pounders rally automatically and the 25-pounders and their trucks and leaders have a morale of 9/8 compared to their Infantry, HMGs, AT-Guns, Mortars and other Leaders, which have that 7/5 morale.

The forward positioned 2-pounder AT-Guns setup to block the German Pz IIs, Pz IIIFs and Pz IVE are pretty useless, as they started disrupted, so the German Infantry follows right in behind them. As the turns progress, the treating allied units and the advancing Germans units start to get mixed in with each other down or along the main road and some other areas as well. With some Allied units disrupted and stalled on the main road, some retreating, and some making last stands in combat, it got really interesting. The Germans kept pushing some infantry and armor forward but at the same time having to keep some back to deal with all the diehard ANZAC units. The Germans also kept the pressure on the far end retreating Allied units in the form of airpower. The New Zealand & Australian units were really starting to mingle in the same stacks along the road heading west.

The 25-pounders & 2-pounders got a few good shots in but it was not nearly enough to stop the German advance and the opportunity to strike all those disrupted and spread out Allied units with direct fire, and few assaults as well. One leader even got overrun. In the end both sides exited a little more than half their units but the Germans eliminated far more steps then the Allies, resulting in a major German victory! The ANZAC were not routed but pretty close!

Keep in mind, just because it was a major German victory doesn’t mean it’s not a good scenario, as the random setup, entry, exit and disruption draw, not to mention the different strategies, of staying to fight, retreat, advance or a mix of the mentions will most likely make this play-out differently. Fun scenario to try and how offend do you get to play one in the Greece Theater? Edelweiss has three scenarios in this campaign, hopefully there will be more someday in PG land!

2 Comments
2012-02-26 05:35

Jay,

This is one I have on my 'to play' 'sights'. Looks like an interesting poser, so Im sure Wayne and I will get this one going soon.

What drew my attention was all the different options for Allies and these options will mean a different take on the same scenario.

Added to this that the Gebirgsjaeger are my favourite German WWII units, then it becomes a must play rather than a want to play.

Thanks for the AAR, nice to see how this one pans out each time. If you like Greece, Wayne and I have played Mt Olympus from the same book, with the glorious Gebirgsjaeger running up winners in that too.

Vince

2012-02-26 11:13

Yeah Vince this is an enjoyable scenario to play. Maybe just a little German favored but a lot of that depends on the Allies setup and overall strategy, so who really knows until it been played 3 or 4 times by the same players. I look forward to your AAR!

You must be a registered member and logged-in to post a comment.
Errors? Omissions? Report them!
Page generated in 0.377 seconds.