Panzer Grenadier Battles on October 24th:
Afrika 1944 #22 - PAKfront Leyte '44 #12 - Flying Wedge
Fronte Russo #9 - Potemkin Village Leyte '44 #13 - Failure at Buri Airfield
Red & White #28 - Bastion
Errors? Omissions? Report them!
Hilltop Village at Takrouna
Dragon Rampant #3
(Defender) Italy vs New Zealand (Attacker)
Formations Involved
Italy 101ª Divisione Fanteria Motorizzata "Trieste"
New Zealand 1st New Zealand Army Tank Brigade
New Zealand 2nd New Zealand Division
Display
Balance:



Overall balance chart for DrRa003
Total
Side 1 1
Draw 0
Side 2 0
Overall Rating, 1 vote
5
4
3
2
1
4
Scenario Rank: --- of 1094
Parent Game Dragon Rampant
Historicity Alt-History
Date 1943-04-01
Start Time 11:00
Turn Count 30
Visibility Day
Counters 72
Net Morale 0
Net Initiative 1
Maps 2: 76, 78
Layout Dimensions 56 x 43 cm
22 x 17 in
Play Bounty 178
AAR Bounty 168
Total Plays 1
Total AARs 1
Battle Types
Breakout
Delaying Action
Hill Control
Inflict Enemy Casualties
Conditions
Entrenchments
Minefields
Off-board Artillery
Randomly-drawn Aircraft
Smoke
Scenario Requirements & Playability
An Army at Dawn Maps + Counters
Dragon Rampant Counters
Introduction

By design, an Army Tank Brigade such as the New Zealand Military Forces proposed adding to their division was intended to support infantry divisions during offensives. The tough Italian-held position at Takrouna resisted even the splendid Kiwi infantry, but this might not have been the case if the New Zealanders could add their own armor to the equation.

Conclusion

This time, we have a heavily modified version of Scenario Eight (Night Action at Takrouna) from NEW ZEALAND DIVISION. For starters, it's not at night: the Kiwis attack at mid-day, not least because this time they have tanks. The Italians are tougher, though, and they have a little armor support of their own. Not much, but it will help.


Display Relevant AFV Rules

AFV Rules Pertaining to this Scenario's Order of Battle
  • Vulnerable to results on the Assault Combat Chart (7.25, 7.63, ACC), and may be attacked by Anti-Tank fire (11.2, DFT). Anti-Tank fire only affects the individual unit fired upon (7.62, 11.0).
  • AFV's are activated by tank leaders (3.2, 3.3, 5.42, 6.8). They may also be activated as part of an initial activating stack, but if activated in this way would need a tank leader in order to carry out combat movement.
  • AFV's do not block Direct Fire (10.1).
  • Full-strength AFV's with "armor efficiency" may make two anti-tank (AT) fire attacks per turn (either in their action segment or during opportunity fire) if they have AT fire values of 0 or more (11.2).
  • Each unit with an AT fire value of 2 or more may fire at targets at a distance of between 100% and 150% of its printed AT range. It does so at half its AT fire value. (11.3)
  • Efficient and non-efficient AFV's may conduct two opportunity fires per turn if using direct fire (7.44, 7.64). Units with both Direct and AT Fire values may use either type of fire in the same turn as their opportunity fire, but not both (7.22, 13.0). Units which can take opportunity fire twice per turn do not have to target the same unit both times (13.0).
  • Demoralized AFV's are not required to flee from units that do not have AT fire values (14.3).
  • Place a Wreck marker when an AFV is eliminated in a bridge or town hex (16.3).
  • AFV's do not benefit from Entrenchments (16.42).
  • AFV's may Dig In (16.2).
  • Open-top AFV's: Immune to M, M1 and M2 results on Direct and Bombardment Fire Tables, but DO take step losses from X and #X results (7.25, 7.41, 7.61, BT, DFT). If a "2X" or "3X" result is rolled, at least one of the step losses must be taken by an open-top AFV if present.
  • Closed-top AFV's: Immune to M, M1 and M2 results on Direct and Bombardment Fire Tables. Do not take step losses from Direct or Bombardment Fire. If X or #X result on Fire Table, make M morale check instead (7.25, 7.41, 7.61, BT, DFT).
  • Closed-top AFV's: Provide the +1 modifier on the Assault Table when combined with infantry. (Modifier only applies to Germans in all scenarios; Soviet Guards in scenarios taking place after 1942; Polish, US and Commonwealth in scenarios taking place after 1943.) (ACC)
  • Tank: all are closed-top and provide the +1 Assault bonus, when applicable
  • Tank Destroyer: do not provide the +1 Assault bonus, even if closed-top (SB)
  • APC – Armored Personnel Carrier: These are Combat Units, but stack like Transports. They can transport personnel units or towed units. They are not counted as combat units for the +1 stacking modifier on the Direct Fire and Bombardment Tables (4.4). They may be activated by regular leaders and tank leaders (1.2, 3.34, 4.3, 5.43). They do not provide the +1 Assault bonus (ACC).

Display Order of Battle

Italy Order of Battle
Regio Esercito
  • Mechanized
  • Towed
New Zealand Order of Battle
New Zealand Army

Display AARs (1)

Squeezed one out, did ya?
Author Grognard Gunny
Method Solo
Victor Italy
Play Date 2025-12-04
Language English
Scenario DrRa003

The Italian Commander set up on the hills/rises on the border of the two playing boards with an AT gun unit and a Sem 75 on either flank and the minefields set up in between, making a run up the road difficult. The Kiwi Commander opted for an Infantry attack on the right flank in the effort to knock out one of the AT gun units (and perhaps a Sem 75 while they were at it). This effort failed miserably. Costing the Kiwis and the Italians an even number of step losses. An effort was then made on the left flank, since it had been weakened by the Italians reinforcing the right flank. This, too, failed. The right flank collapsed (finally) but by then the Kiwis had very little in the way of Infantry left. The Italians made a good retreat with what they had left to the 60 meter high massif on the left side of board 76. There they prepared their last stand. Both of the Sem 75s were still active but the Kiwis had very little Infantry left in which to force the Italians off the last hilltop. At this point the step loss was absolutely even. The Kiwi Commander decided to try for a run off the board to the North and to try to pick off another step or two along the way to try to achieve the victory that way. Unfortunately, the Sem 75s blasted their way to victory while the Kiwis were trying to run off North. (Note - This is an excellant scenario for on-line play.)

1 Comment
2025-12-04 14:18

Another concise, well-written, colorful & interesting AAR!

You must be a registered member and logged-in to post a comment.
Errors? Omissions? Report them!
Page generated in 0.893 seconds.