Errors? Omissions? Report them!
320th Grenadier Regiment 
Germany 320th Infantry Division
|
|
Battle History & Combat Effectiveness
| Overall | Wins | Draws | Losses | Total | CE | CE Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 7 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 70% | 518/2,982 |
| Attacking | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 100% | 72/2,982 |
| Defending | 4 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 57% | 503/2,982 |
| Shared | Wins | Draws | Losses | Total | CE | CE Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 100% | 74/2,982 |
| Attacking | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100% | 173/2,982 |
| Defending | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100% | 200/2,982 |
| Solo | Wins | Draws | Losses | Total | CE | CE Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 5 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 63% | 714/2,982 |
| Attacking | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 100% | 127/2,982 |
| Defending | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 50% | 611/2,982 |
| Overall Rating, 11 votes |
|---|
|
3.91
|
| Formation Rank: 204 of 1847 |
Display Scenario List (4)
| Game | Scenario | Plays | AARs | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Broken Axis | 28. Tashlyk Bridgehead Scenario 2: Which Bridgehead to Take? | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| Broken Axis | 30. Tashlyk Bridgehead Scenario 4: Retaking Serpeni | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Burning Tigers 2 | 5. Aggressive Defense | 0 | 0 | --- |
| Burning Tigers | 5. Kempf V: That Old Strategic Sense | 5 | 3 | 3.8 |
Display Games (3)
| Percentage of Each Game's Scenarios Featuring this Formation | ||
|---|---|---|
| Broken Axis |
4%
|
Broken Axis |
| Burning Tigers 2 |
3%
|
Burning Tigers 2 |
| Burning Tigers |
2%
|
Burning Tigers |
Errors? Omissions? Report them!