Panzer Grenadier Battles on April 27th:
Arctic Front Deluxe #40 - Children's Crusade Broken Axis #14 - Târgu Frumos: The Second Battle Scenario 3: Sledge Hammer of the Proletariat
Army Group South Ukraine #6 - Consternation Road to Berlin #73 - She-Wolves of the SS
Errors? Omissions? Report them!
Sergeant Harris
Panzer Lehr #7
(Defender) Germany vs Britain (Attacker)
Formations Involved
Britain 4th/7th Dragoon Guards
Britain 6th Durham Light Infantry
Britain 9th Durham Light Infantry
Germany 130th "Lehr" Panzer Division
Display
Balance:



Overall balance chart for PaLe007
Total
Side 1 1
Draw 0
Side 2 2
Overall Rating, 3 votes
5
4
3
2
1
3.67
Scenario Rank: --- of 913
Parent Game Panzer Lehr
Historicity Historical
Date 1944-06-14
Start Time 14:00
Turn Count 14
Visibility Day
Counters 86
Net Morale 0
Net Initiative 1
Maps 1: 29
Layout Dimensions 43 x 28 cm
17 x 11 in
Play Bounty 157
AAR Bounty 153
Total Plays 3
Total AARs 4
Battle Types
Bridge Control
Inflict Enemy Casualties
Urban Assault
Scenario Requirements & Playability
Beyond Normandy Counters
Fall of France 1 Maps
Panzer Lehr Base Game
Introduction

On the 11th the 7th Armoured Division had proved unable to clear the woods north of Lingevres, leaving the village in German hands. After their further debacle at Villers-Bocage on the 13th, it appeared they would be unable to conduct offensive operations in the near future. So the 50th Infantry Division slid over and assumed responsibility for taking Lingevres.

Conclusion

While the 7th Armoured Division drew intense criticism for falling to press home their attacks in Normandy, the 6th Durham Light Infantry spent six grueling hours clearing the woods north of Lingevres. The fresh 9th Durham Light Infantry then destroyed the 6th Company of the panzer grenadiers and claimed the village. Panther tanks soon appeared to dispute that claim and a spirited tank battle began. Sergeant N. Harris ended the contest in the British favor when his Firefly accounted for five of the intruding Panthers. The rest of the panzers withdrew leaving the village firmly in British hands.


Display Relevant AFV Rules

AFV Rules Pertaining to this Scenario's Order of Battle
  • Vulnerable to results on the Assault Combat Chart (7.25, 7.63, ACC), and may be attacked by Anti-Tank fire (11.2, DFT). Anti-Tank fire only affects the individual unit fired upon (7.62, 11.0).
  • AFV's are activated by tank leaders (3.2, 3.3, 5.42, 6.8). They may also be activated as part of an initial activating stack, but if activated in this way would need a tank leader in order to carry out combat movement.
  • AFV's do not block Direct Fire (10.1).
  • Full-strength AFV's with "armor efficiency" may make two anti-tank (AT) fire attacks per turn (either in their action segment or during opportunity fire) if they have AT fire values of 0 or more (11.2).
  • Each unit with an AT fire value of 2 or more may fire at targets at a distance of between 100% and 150% of its printed AT range. It does so at half its AT fire value. (11.3)
  • Efficient and non-efficient AFV's may conduct two opportunity fires per turn if using direct fire (7.44, 7.64). Units with both Direct and AT Fire values may use either type of fire in the same turn as their opportunity fire, but not both (7.22, 13.0). Units which can take opportunity fire twice per turn do not have to target the same unit both times (13.0).
  • Demoralized AFV's are not required to flee from units that do not have AT fire values (14.3).
  • Place a Wreck marker when an AFV is eliminated in a bridge or town hex (16.3).
  • AFV's do not benefit from Entrenchments (16.42).
  • AFV's may Dig In (16.2).
  • Open-top AFV's: Immune to M, M1 and M2 results on Direct and Bombardment Fire Tables, but DO take step losses from X and #X results (7.25, 7.41, 7.61, BT, DFT). If a "2X" or "3X" result is rolled, at least one of the step losses must be taken by an open-top AFV if present.
  • Closed-top AFV's: Immune to M, M1 and M2 results on Direct and Bombardment Fire Tables. Do not take step losses from Direct or Bombardment Fire. If X or #X result on Fire Table, make M morale check instead (7.25, 7.41, 7.61, BT, DFT).
  • Closed-top AFV's: Provide the +1 modifier on the Assault Table when combined with infantry. (Modifier only applies to Germans in all scenarios; Soviet Guards in scenarios taking place after 1942; Polish, US and Commonwealth in scenarios taking place after 1943.) (ACC)
  • Tank: all are closed-top and provide the +1 Assault bonus, when applicable
  • Assault Gun: if closed-top, provide the +1 Assault bonus, when applicable
  • APC – Armored Personnel Carrier: These are Combat Units, but stack like Transports. They can transport personnel units or towed units. They are not counted as combat units for the +1 stacking modifier on the Direct Fire and Bombardment Tables (4.4). They may be activated by regular leaders and tank leaders (1.2, 3.34, 4.3, 5.43). They do not provide the +1 Assault bonus (ACC).
  • Prime Movers: Transports which only transport towed units and/or leaders (May not carry personnel units). May or may not be armored (armored models are open-top). All are mechanized. (SB)

Display Order of Battle

Britain Order of Battle
Army
  • Towed
Germany Order of Battle
130th "Lehr" Panzer Division
  • Mechanized
  • Towed
Heer
  • Mechanized

Display Errata (4)

4 Errata Items
Overall balance chart for 869

All Bren carriers should have a movement value of 7.

(Shad on 2010 Dec 15)
Overall balance chart for 838

The "Optional Values" for the Firefly given in an Avalanche Press Daily Content piece on the 17-Pdr Anti-Tank gun (and printed on a replacement counter sheet Download) are now the Official Ratings, published in games like Cassino '44, Grossdeutschland 1946, and Indian Unity. These are:

5-5 / 8-8 Full Strength and 3-5 / 8-8 Reduced Strength.

(caryn on 2012 May 03)
Overall balance chart for 1230

Counter is mislabeled, this is actually a 75/41.

(rerathbun on 2013 Mar 06)
Overall balance chart for 63

The morale and combat modifiers of German Sergeant #1614 should be "0", not "8".

(Shad on 2010 Dec 15)

Display AARs (4)

Walked into it
Author Matt W
Method Solo
Victor Germany
Play Date 2012-10-19
Language English
Scenario PaLe007

Panzer Lehr makes massive use of hidden units. This scenario is a great example why. An overwhelming British force is advancing on Panzer Lehr, 1/2 of which is hidden. This is important as they are outnumbered 3-1. Without being hidden they could be seen, and attacked in detail in the wooded populated area. As it is, with clever hidden forces the Germans can extract a terrible toll before surrendering the territory under question. In the first two turns they had caused 11 step losses on the British and careful use of their StGs resulted in many more losses in assaults and a very cautious advance by the British.

The scenario opened up about turn 6 as the British got beyond the wooded entry to the east of the river and advanced on the bridge leading to the town on the western shore. At the same time a combined infantry and armor force advanced towards the town through the wooded hill on the west of the river. They "found" the last bit of hidden forces (1 ENG, 1 HMG and 2 GREN) in the town. They trashed the force coming from the east with artillery and DF from a StG in the town and the infantry/engineer/HMGs destroyed some Shermans and accompanying infantry completely repelling the attacks. The StGs were able to knock out some more Shermans but the British were able to run the table on the east of the river. Unfortunately for them their earlier losses and the short timeframe added up to a German victory 53-40 in points as the eastern shore of the river and the bridges remained in German hands.

Ultimately, it was the ambushes and the hidden units which made the win possible. Without that the British would have been able to avoid the fire and keep from losses which led to the loss. I rate this one a "3", without the hidden forces it would fall to a 2. If you can't play solo with "hidden" units, it will be hard to get much out of this one.

0 Comments
You must be a registered member and logged-in to post a comment.
Tea Time
Author Matt W (Britain)
Method Face to Face
Victor Britain
Participants Hugmenot (AAR)
Play Date 2013-07-06
Language English
Scenario PaLe007

I'm really starting to get the hang of using the Western Allies armor and AT capabilities. British and American armor is more of an infantry support arm as opposed to the German "superior weapon system" approach. The Allies will lose tanks but their job is to help to keep the nasty German stuff in check and to help out the PBI to take the ground necessary. It helps that the Allies typically have plenty of armor so that the losses can be absorbed.

In this scenario nearly a whole brigade of British are trying to take ground quickly from a battalion of Lehr's finest. Lehr has a couple of StGs and will recive a couple of Panthers. The British counter with a bunch of Shermans and some Firefly support.

Daniel set up defense in depth. As a matter of fact, some of his hidden units didn't appear until nearly at the end of the game. As a result I could use the strength of the British force deliberately and was able to force my way into the first large town relatively straightforwardly.

In the mid-game Daniel had to roll four times before his Panthers arrived. I was able to station some Shermans on a wooded hill nearby their entry area. Right after they arrived I received a couple of initiative activations and rather than use them to get the Shermans out of sight I ran off a couple of assaults on town hexes that were teetering. Momentarily blinded by the success of those assaults I forgot that my Sherman crews were apparently taking tea. While they brewed up the Panthers made sure that the Shermans were similarly brewed up.

The loss of these two Sherman platoons was the primary reason that this one ended up as a minor rather than a major British victory (I missed the major victory by one victory point and the Shermans represented 8 VPs).

This one really needs to be played face to face. With such a large troop advantage the Germans need to edge of the hidden units to make a fight of it, even given the short timeframe (14 turns). Having said that, it is a very good and challenging fight for both sides. The British can, and will, take ground away from Lehr but the timeframe forces the British to be exposed to the strong German units which can extract a significant toll. I give it a "4".

0 Comments
You must be a registered member and logged-in to post a comment.
Token Resistance
Author Hugmenot (Germany)
Method Face to Face
Victor Britain
Participants Matt W (AAR)
Play Date 2013-07-06
Language English
Scenario PaLe007

Played face-to-face against Matt W in one 3.5 hour session.

You can see pictures of the setup in post #7 of this thread.

I felt that our last battle, scenario #6 of Panzer Lehr, that I had set up my hidden too far forward. Almost all were revealed in the first few activations and it allowed the British commander to press the attack quickly and force my troops in secondary defensive positions too early.

So I decided to set several hidden units farther back this time, too many in my opinion. The British commander advanced a few scouts forward and quickly overran my forward positions in no time. Five or six turns into the game and the British were already contesting the town located in the middle of the board.

The Germans did well defending the town but time was on the British side and it was inevitable the town would fall. While fighting for that town, the British send detachments to capture the bridges and to pin down the Germans defending the other town.

The British were already in major victory territory when the Panthers showed up. The British commander made a mistake and failed to put his Shermans out of harm’s way and the Panthers blew them up. I now had a chance at a minor defeat if I captured back the two bridges (they were defended by one INF unit each) and the British failed to contest an hex of the last town. The Panthers were able to take back the bridges with help from the artillery; the British advanced a few units but they were all disrupted just before the town.. The British had one last shot at a major victory but rolled very badly on their bombardment rolls.

British minor victory!

I rated this one a “4” because there was lots of tension trying to get out of a major defeat. I was also impressed how Matt isolated my troops, not allowing me to shift troops between the towns.

If you play this one as the Germans, do take a look at the pictures I posted and set up your troops differently; you will need to slow down the British attack if you want to have a chance at a win.

0 Comments
You must be a registered member and logged-in to post a comment.
The importance of Hidden Units
Author Dean_P
Method Solo
Victor Britain
Play Date 2014-02-02
Language English
Scenario PaLe007

The setup for this scenario heavily favors the Brits. They heavily outnumber the Germans and have to cause step losses and control cities to get the victory points. The only question comes down to whether the Germans can damage the Brits and hold enough city hexes to win. The biggest advantage the Germans have is that they're hidden.

This advantage ceases to exist when playing solo. The Brits can never walk into a trap, and hence have little to fear when moving forward. The only problem the Brits had in this episode was to keep the formations together as they attacked. That said, the Germans were very spirited in their defense and getting them out of their holes was difficult.

I rated this a 3 because if the defense the Germans exhibited was coupled with surprise attacks from hidden units, the cohesion the Brits enjoyed would likely disappear. Jumble the British column and gaining victory conditions would improve dramatically.

1 Comment
2014-02-02 17:48

Always at the end of a Skype link if you ever want to experience real hidden units :-)

You must be a registered member and logged-in to post a comment.
Errors? Omissions? Report them!
Page generated in 0.799 seconds.