Panzer Grenadier Battles on April 27th:
Arctic Front Deluxe #40 - Children's Crusade Broken Axis #14 - Târgu Frumos: The Second Battle Scenario 3: Sledge Hammer of the Proletariat
Army Group South Ukraine #6 - Consternation Road to Berlin #73 - She-Wolves of the SS
Errors? Omissions? Report them!
The Underwater Bridges
Counter Attack #9
(Defender) North Korea vs United States (Attacker)
Formations Involved
Display
Balance:



Overall balance chart for KWCA009
Total
Side 1 1
Draw 0
Side 2 2
Overall Rating, 3 votes
5
4
3
2
1
4
Scenario Rank: --- of 913
Parent Game Counter Attack
Historicity Historical
Date 1950-08-11
Start Time 09:00
Turn Count 20
Visibility Day
Counters 84
Net Morale 0
Net Initiative 0
Maps 1: 112
Layout Dimensions 43 x 28 cm
17 x 11 in
Play Bounty 166
AAR Bounty 171
Total Plays 3
Total AARs 1
Battle Types
Bridge Control
River Crossing
Conditions
Hidden Units
Off-board Artillery
Smoke
Scenario Requirements & Playability
Counter Attack Base Game
Introduction

Under the cover of darkness, North Korean sappers used whatever local materials could be found to build so-called “underwater bridges” across the Naktong with their roadbeds just under the surface of the water. A common practice from the Chinese War of Resistance and the Soviet Union’s Great Patriotic War, the bridges remained invisible to enemy air reconnaissance or to anyone on the ground viewing from a distance. The NKPA could move its heavy equipment across the river as it wished, without fear of American air attack.

Conclusion

Thanks to their secret river crossings, the North Koreans had managed to bring artillery within close support range of their positions around Cloverleaf Hill. A North Korean attack stopped two American regiments at the starting lines of their own offensives, and drove other American troops out of their assembly areas. Soon the entire 4th Division had crossed the river and the American intention to attack became instead a question of holding their own lines.


Display Relevant AFV Rules

AFV Rules Pertaining to this Scenario's Order of Battle
  • Vulnerable to results on the Assault Combat Chart (7.25, 7.63, ACC), and may be attacked by Anti-Tank fire (11.2, DFT). Anti-Tank fire only affects the individual unit fired upon (7.62, 11.0).

Display Order of Battle

North Korea Order of Battle
Chosŏn inmin'gun
  • Motorized
United States Order of Battle
Army
  • Motorized

Display AARs (1)

Korean War: Counter-Attack, scenario #9: The Underwater Bridges
Author JayTownsend
Method Solo
Victor North Korea
Play Date 2017-07-04
Language English
Scenario KWCA009

Korean War: Counter-Attack, scenario #9: The Underwater Bridges

Dang, this was a bloody scenario. The North Koreans have setup two underwater bridges the night before and can move freely back and forth between the two side of the river but they don’t need to, just defend the two bridges and keep 12 or more steps on the east side of the river. The North Koreans in fact setup all of their Infantry, two layers of dug-in Infantry type units; INF, SMG, HMG and ATRs on the east side of the river. Their 120mm & 82mm Mortars are setup on the west side of the river with a direct view of the approaching American forces and the North Korean 122mm & 76.2mm artillery is setup on the west side of the river and well but tucked safely behind some hills to keep out of harm’s way of the American off-board artillery, with a strength of 3 x 18 or 54 points, The NKPA have a COL with nice combat modifier and since the North Koreans artillery is setup adjacent can combine fire for a total of 48 plus 1 for the Leaders modifier, so now at a 49 strength.

All the victory conditions are about the North Koreans keeping 12 or more steps on the east side of the river on map #112, casualties don’t mater, so it’s a bloody scenario. The Americans have a pretty good force and nice off-board but only 20 turns to get the NKPA below 12 steps on the east side of the river and if they can get at the underwater bridges they can lower the North Korean morale for units on the east side but getting through two layer of defensive lines stack against each other is a tall order.

The U.S. Army decided to use their numbers and frontally assaults the North Korean line with everything they have but one small taskforce in the south, with 1 x ENG, 1 x INF, 1 x RR57mm, 1 x Jeep and 2 Leaders will try and cross the river south with the engineers help and go after that unspotted NKPA artillery.

The mass American frontal assault starts out very poorly, they are hit with 49 points of on-board NKPA artillery with a 2 dice roll taking out two steps of Infantry followed another bad event of other American units pulling adjacent to two stacks of North Korean units, consisting of 2 x SMG, 1 x INF, 1 x HMG and one of the NKPA better Lieutenants with a combat modifier and anther dice roll of 2 against 24 points of adjacent fire causing the Americans which had three combat units in this stack to lose 3 steps and one leader. I should have started over but that is combat, you never know.

The Americans must have drawn the worst Lieutenant counters possible with 3 out of 4 of them with a morale of 7. The Americans end around move only managed to suppress some of the hidden NKPA artillery for a few turns but not until turn 10 or 11 but it recovered the attacking force was too small and suppressed themselves. The main American assault ended very poorly and after 14 turns I pulled the plus, as the American had lost 13 steps to the North Koreans 6 steps and more importantly the North Koreans still had 31 steps on the east side of the river and many of the American’s remaining steps were demoralized or disrupted and with only 6 turns left, they didn’t stand a chance in Hell of getting the NKPA steps below 12 on the east side of the river.

My strategy for the American side was pretty bad, assuming I could mass attack in strength but my overall strategy as the North Korean side was pretty good but their initial hot dice rolls really set the tone for this scenario. I think a little more patience on the Americans side and little less luck on the NKPA side might have paid-off but still a very tough one for the Americans to overcome. Not the outcome I was hoping for on the 4th of July but still a great tribute to the American service members who sacrificed so much through many conflicts to keep our country safe!

0 Comments
You must be a registered member and logged-in to post a comment.
Errors? Omissions? Report them!
Page generated in 0.692 seconds.