Panzer Grenadier Battles on April 27th:
Arctic Front Deluxe #40 - Children's Crusade Broken Axis #14 - Târgu Frumos: The Second Battle Scenario 3: Sledge Hammer of the Proletariat
Army Group South Ukraine #6 - Consternation Road to Berlin #73 - She-Wolves of the SS
Errors? Omissions? Report them!
Violent Resistance
Indian Unity #8
(Defender) Hyderabad vs Britain (Attacker)
India (Attacker)
Formations Involved
Hyderabad 8th Hyderabad Infantry
India 18th "King Edward's Own" Cavalry
India 2nd Jodhpur Infantry
India 3rd Sikh Light Infantry
Display
Balance:



Overall balance chart for InUn008
Total
Side 1 2
Draw 1
Side 2 0
Overall Rating, 5 votes
5
4
3
2
1
3.8
Scenario Rank: 204 of 913
Parent Game Indian Unity
Historicity Historical
Date 1948-09-14
Start Time 22:30
Turn Count 29
Visibility Night
Counters 112
Net Morale 1
Net Initiative 0
Maps 3: 1, 24, 4
Layout Dimensions 84 x 43 cm
33 x 17 in
Play Bounty 185
AAR Bounty 159
Total Plays 3
Total AARs 3
Battle Types
Road Control
Urban Assault
Scenario Requirements & Playability
Cassino '44 Counters
Eastern Front Maps
Elsenborn Ridge Maps
Indian Unity Base Game
Introduction

While the major city of Aurangabad fell with only token resistance, the Hyderabadis dispatched regulars and Razakars to hold the nearby town of Jalna, an important road junction. Elated at their easy conquest of the big city, the Indians did not expect the fierce resistance they encountered as they moved eastward.

Conclusion

The Hyderabadis fought furiously through the night, engaging the Sikhs in hand-to-hand combat. In the darkness, Razakar fanaticism could help offset superior Indian firepower and the town remained in the hands of the royal troops. But as the sun rose, the Indian tanks no longer had to close with the enemy and Indian mobility could make itself felt. By mid-morning the town had fallen, and Hyderabad's defenses were crumbling on all fronts.


Display Relevant AFV Rules

AFV Rules Pertaining to this Scenario's Order of Battle
  • Vulnerable to results on the Assault Combat Chart (7.25, 7.63, ACC), and may be attacked by Anti-Tank fire (11.2, DFT). Anti-Tank fire only affects the individual unit fired upon (7.62, 11.0).
  • AFV's are activated by tank leaders (3.2, 3.3, 5.42, 6.8). They may also be activated as part of an initial activating stack, but if activated in this way would need a tank leader in order to carry out combat movement.
  • AFV's do not block Direct Fire (10.1).
  • Full-strength AFV's with "armor efficiency" may make two anti-tank (AT) fire attacks per turn (either in their action segment or during opportunity fire) if they have AT fire values of 0 or more (11.2).
  • Each unit with an AT fire value of 2 or more may fire at targets at a distance of between 100% and 150% of its printed AT range. It does so at half its AT fire value. (11.3)
  • Efficient and non-efficient AFV's may conduct two opportunity fires per turn if using direct fire (7.44, 7.64). Units with both Direct and AT Fire values may use either type of fire in the same turn as their opportunity fire, but not both (7.22, 13.0). Units which can take opportunity fire twice per turn do not have to target the same unit both times (13.0).
  • Demoralized AFV's are not required to flee from units that do not have AT fire values (14.3).
  • Place a Wreck marker when an AFV is eliminated in a bridge or town hex (16.3).
  • AFV's do not benefit from Entrenchments (16.42).
  • AFV's may Dig In (16.2).
  • Closed-top AFV's: Immune to M, M1 and M2 results on Direct and Bombardment Fire Tables. Do not take step losses from Direct or Bombardment Fire. If X or #X result on Fire Table, make M morale check instead (7.25, 7.41, 7.61, BT, DFT).
  • Closed-top AFV's: Provide the +1 modifier on the Assault Table when combined with infantry. (Modifier only applies to Germans in all scenarios; Soviet Guards in scenarios taking place after 1942; Polish, US and Commonwealth in scenarios taking place after 1943.) (ACC)
  • Tank: all are closed-top and provide the +1 Assault bonus, when applicable

Display Order of Battle

Britain Order of Battle
Army
  • Motorized
Hyderabad Order of Battle
Army
Razakars
  • Foot
India Order of Battle
Army
  • Mechanized
  • Motorized

Display Errata (1)

1 Errata Item
Overall balance chart for 871

Ignore the direct fire values.

(Shad on 2010 Dec 15)

Display AARs (3)

Thrilling end to a hard fought battle
Author waynebaumber (Hyderabad)
Method Dual Table Setup + Voice Chat
Victor Draw
Participants tlangston28 (AAR)
Play Date 2020-10-14
Language English
Scenario InUn008

What can one say about a 29 turn scenario which goes down to the last die roll, well here goes. The scenario takes place at night with large Indian forces with Tanks and Mortars, trying to clear roads and towns without losing to any steps. Right from the start it should be noted this is going to be a tough scenario for the Indians to win, the darkness as always helps the weaker side and the Raz morale will help in the many assaults which will occur in this scenario. The Indians advance onto the board and begin to clear the roads however, Raz began almost at once to harass the Indian lines of communication and the rebel artillery began to cause the light Indian tanks some issues, however the Indian steamroller continued at began to assault the main town making good progress although losses began to mount on both sides, very soon the Indian step loss cap had been exceeded. The town was taken except for on enclave which held onto almost the last turn. The Indian attention now fell on the small village to the south which was stoutly defended by HMG, RAZ and INF with support units dug in. The rebel forces had now also re-occupied vital road hexes meaning that it would be very unlikely that the Indian player could win this scenario and would have to take the village to make it a drawn game. The last few turns were wild with some very strange die rolls, at one stage every unit in the village was demoralized, however the Indians were the first to rally and on the last attacked the village again which resulted in the last RAZ unit being demoralized again. However the Hydrabad player had a roll to rally this unit and even if disrupted will deny the Indian player the draw. Tension was high as the roll was made, 7 required for a famous win.....9 rolled. A fair result one might say. What a great scenario lots of fun, leaders deserting, lucky rolls followed immediately by unlucky rolls, a great PG gaming experiance.

0 Comments
You must be a registered member and logged-in to post a comment.
Such a hard and tense fight for a Draw...
Author tlangston28 (Britain, India)
Method Dual Table Setup + Voice Chat
Victor Draw
Participants waynebaumber (AAR)
Play Date 2020-10-14
Language English
Scenario InUn008

Continuing our campaign to finish Indian Unity, Violent Resistance was next on the list and it did not disappoint. The objectives for the Indians to attain a major victory were very steep:

  1. Maintain road control across all three maps
  2. Secure ALL town hexes on the middle map (24)
  3. End the game losing less than 10 steps.

A minor victory would be 2 objectives and a Draw would be attaining at least 1 objective. Knowing how much I LOVE ROAD CONTROL VICTORY CONDITIONS I went into this game shooting for a minor as I was hopeful that the night conditions would allow a good advance before being threatened by the Hyderabad on board Artillery. Indian foot units proceeded straight towards the towns on board 24 with a small contingent, heading into the woods to clear any rebel units there. The Stuarts, meanwhile, headed north to speed around the hills and light woods and approach from the north, where the big guns were blocked by the large town in the center.

Despite some early successful hits by the artillery, spotted by pesky officers in the woods, The Indian troops were able to make it to the large town with about half of the game yet to play. methodical assaults into the town eventually cleared the larger one except for a lone AT gun and RAZ units that were able to stave off Indian assaults until almost the end of the game. Meanwhile, other units went about securing the area, destroying the rebel guns and making a final advance on the single town hex on the south of the Map. Unfortunately, the tenacious fighting of the Hyderabadis were able to inflict the required 10+ step losses so the remainder of the game was focused on gaining control of both towns and preventing kamikaze assaults by the Hyderabads.

The Hyderabads were able to keep several RAZ units close by to continually feed the defense of the single hex and with 2 turns left, the Indian units were able whittle down the rebels to a single RAZ and leader and to maintain a combined arms assault, however, an infantry unit and the Stuart in town were disrupted so obtaining the draw looked very dim. Dim as it was, I did spot an opportunity for the Indian LT COL to take 2 INF from the larger town and jumping on trucks, were able to get into position to relieve the disrupted units in the final assault.

On the final turn, the Indians launched the final desperate assault that did not kill the RAZ unit but caused a demoralization to the RAZ in town. All he needed to do to rally (he was helped by a leader and in a town so his morale went from 7 to 9) was to roll an 8 and unfortunately (or fortunately for the Indians) he rolled a 9, fled and effectively ended the game.

Both Wayne and I agreed that though it was a tough slog for the Indians to gain the victory, the back and forth play along with the night rules (which I am usually not a fan of) made for a very fun and exciting scenario that hinged on the last play of the game. A solid scenario in a book that for the most part, does not disappoint!

0 Comments
You must be a registered member and logged-in to post a comment.
Fanatics
Author Matt W (Hyderabad)
Method Face to Face
Victor Hyderabad
Participants Hugmenot
Play Date 2012-12-29
Language English
Scenario InUn008

This was played in two sessions face to face with Hugmenot in our continuing series on Indian Unity. I apologize to Daniel for the dice in question. Apparently fate had to even out my luck from my play with Vince.

The Indian goal is to secure a town and the roads leading up to it to facilitate their advance towards the center of Hyderabad. The Hyderabadis want to stop them from doing this and cause losses to the Indians. As usual the indifferent Hyderabadi regulars are supported by the Razakar fanatics. Interestingly, the Razakars during the earlier scenarios are liabilities with virtually no combat effect and low morale. As the campaign continues, however, they become more radicalized and their morale improves such that they often deny the Indians a morale bonus in combat. If they take losses, however, their morale plummets and they are easily chased.

Early on, the Hyderabadis were very effective, easily reaching the loss totals required for a minor victory at the half way point. It became apparent in addition that the dispersed Hyderabadi troops would be able to contest road hexes such that the best option for the Indians would be to focus on taking the large town on board 24. Indeed, such a capture would only provide the Indians with a draw (which Daniel and I feel is the likely result of a contested battle) as their minor victory would then match the minor victory claimed by the Hyderabadis.

Standing in the way of such a capture, however, were several stacks of Hyderabaids. The largest included 18DF and a leader giving them an actual higher column than any of the projected attackers. Having just cleared a town hex of Indian defenders I felt confident that this would be the hex that would give me the chance to win. Unfortunately, a DF attack caused a step loss with a morale cascade which was not able to recover immediately. In the following turn the Indians assaulted and although the battle for that hex raged for 5-6 more turns it was never really in doubt.

With 5 turns to go it appeared that the town would fall. Three hexes remained contested but in none of them could the Hyderabadis contest with more than the "5" column. In one hex a lone Razakar faced down an imposing attack including armor and sappers. Starting on the 18 column and moving to the 24 column, Daniel attacked the Razakars, always failing to get the step loss that would have changed the high morale fanatics into terrified remnants. Disruption after disruption was followed by recovery after recovery with the game ending with the Razakars still in the town hex in good order. A Hyderabadi major victory as they denied the Indian any level of victory.

I give this one a "3". There is a good balance in the scenario but there isn't a lot the Hyderabaid player can do but to set up, and counter the Indian player. In that it is much like the early war Eastern Front scenarios where masses of Hyderabadis will be lost.

0 Comments
You must be a registered member and logged-in to post a comment.
Errors? Omissions? Report them!
Page generated in 1.309 seconds.