Panzer Grenadier Battles on April 27th:
Arctic Front Deluxe #40 - Children's Crusade Broken Axis #14 - Târgu Frumos: The Second Battle Scenario 3: Sledge Hammer of the Proletariat
Army Group South Ukraine #6 - Consternation Road to Berlin #73 - She-Wolves of the SS
Errors? Omissions? Report them!
1940: Fall of France Scenario 22: Furia Francese!
Division Marocaine #3
(Attacker) Germany vs France (Defender)
Morocco (Defender)
Formations Involved
France 110e Régiment d'Infanterie
France 1re Division Marocaine
France 2e Régiment de Tirailleurs Marocains
France 7e Régiment de Tirailleurs Marocains
Germany 3rd Panzer Division
Display
Balance:



Overall balance chart for DiMa003
Total
Side 1 0
Draw 2
Side 2 1
Overall Rating, 3 votes
5
4
3
2
1
4
Scenario Rank: --- of 913
Parent Game Division Marocaine
Historicity Historical
Date 1940-05-15
Start Time 17:30
Turn Count 16
Visibility Day
Counters 133
Net Morale 0
Net Initiative 1
Maps 2: 31, 32
Layout Dimensions 86 x 28 cm
34 x 11 in
Play Bounty 189
AAR Bounty 159
Total Plays 3
Total AARs 3
Battle Types
Rural Assault
Conditions
Minefields
Off-board Artillery
Randomly-drawn Aircraft
Reinforcements
Terrain Mods
Scenario Requirements & Playability
Division Marocaine Base Game
Fall of France 1 Maps + Counters
Introduction

The French line had repulsed nearly all assaults, but Ernage was a soft spot. German forays had bypassed the small village and pushed onto Cortil Noirmont, where they stopped at 1730. After some moments of near-panic, the Moroccans rallied after their divisional commander General Mellier took the field himself to lead the counterattack that had been planned since 1130 that morning.

Conclusion

General Mellier committed his entire reserve to the counterattack, with the objective of retaking the railway line. The forces moved out early in the afternoon but were slowed by Stuka attacks and German artillery fire. Then as they neared the scene of the action, all their Renault 35 tanks were abruptly rerouted to Gembloux. That left their infantry no armor support, but nonetheless the arrival of reinforcements stiffened the resolve of the French units holding the line. Around 2030 in Cortil-Couvent and Cortil-Noirmont, French antitank guns destroyed five panzers in the space of just a few minutes. Then the Moroccans at the front stood up and charged the Germans and forced them to fall back behind the railway. The day ended with a clear French victory, even though both sides had nearly been bled dry. The Gembloux battle was the lone example during the France 1940 campaign of infantry division successfully blocking the armored advance.

Additional Notes

The Division Marocaine counterset replaces the French INF with Moroccan ESC. The Moroccan Division was at the peak of its fighting prowess.

The scenario book suggests that the reinforcement are from from unit other than the Marocain Division. I have adjusted the OOB on this page accordingly.

(Special note: Marocain HMG units have a Movement factor of 2.)


Display Relevant AFV Rules

AFV Rules Pertaining to this Scenario's Order of Battle
  • Vulnerable to results on the Assault Combat Chart (7.25, 7.63, ACC), and may be attacked by Anti-Tank fire (11.2, DFT). Anti-Tank fire only affects the individual unit fired upon (7.62, 11.0).
  • AFV's are activated by tank leaders (3.2, 3.3, 5.42, 6.8). They may also be activated as part of an initial activating stack, but if activated in this way would need a tank leader in order to carry out combat movement.
  • AFV's do not block Direct Fire (10.1).
  • Full-strength AFV's with "armor efficiency" may make two anti-tank (AT) fire attacks per turn (either in their action segment or during opportunity fire) if they have AT fire values of 0 or more (11.2).
  • Each unit with an AT fire value of 2 or more may fire at targets at a distance of between 100% and 150% of its printed AT range. It does so at half its AT fire value. (11.3)
  • Efficient and non-efficient AFV's may conduct two opportunity fires per turn if using direct fire (7.44, 7.64). Units with both Direct and AT Fire values may use either type of fire in the same turn as their opportunity fire, but not both (7.22, 13.0). Units which can take opportunity fire twice per turn do not have to target the same unit both times (13.0).
  • Demoralized AFV's are not required to flee from units that do not have AT fire values (14.3).
  • Place a Wreck marker when an AFV is eliminated in a bridge or town hex (16.3).
  • AFV's do not benefit from Entrenchments (16.42).
  • AFV's may Dig In (16.2).
  • Closed-top AFV's: Immune to M, M1 and M2 results on Direct and Bombardment Fire Tables. Do not take step losses from Direct or Bombardment Fire. If X or #X result on Fire Table, make M morale check instead (7.25, 7.41, 7.61, BT, DFT).
  • Closed-top AFV's: Provide the +1 modifier on the Assault Table when combined with infantry. (Modifier only applies to Germans in all scenarios; Soviet Guards in scenarios taking place after 1942; Polish, US and Commonwealth in scenarios taking place after 1943.) (ACC)
  • Tank: all are closed-top and provide the +1 Assault bonus, when applicable
  • Prime Movers: Transports which only transport towed units and/or leaders (May not carry personnel units). May or may not be armored (armored models are open-top). All are mechanized. (SB)

Display Order of Battle

France Order of Battle
Armée de Terre
  • Mechanized
  • Motorized
Moroccan Ground Forces
Germany Order of Battle
Heer
  • Motorized
Luftwaffe
  • Towed

Display Errata (4)

4 Errata Items
Overall balance chart for 623

In 1940: Fall of France, the units show Direct Fire. All units are Indirect Fire.

(rerathbun on 2015 Jun 06)
Overall balance chart for 1564

The unit label on the counter is 25mm, but should be 20mm. No effect on play.

(plloyd1010 on 2016 Apr 01)
Overall balance chart for 20

The reduced direct fire value of the Heer HMG became 5-5 starting with Fall of France.

(plloyd1010 on 2015 Jul 31)
Overall balance chart for 63

The morale and combat modifiers of German Sergeant #1614 should be "0", not "8".

(Shad on 2010 Dec 15)

Display AARs (3)

Tiralleurs Hold the Line
Author Schoenwulf
Method Solo
Victor Draw
Play Date 2017-05-29
Language English
Scenario DiMa003

Late in the afternoon of May 15, 1940, the fighting continued between Perbais and Gembloux, Belgium. Units from the French 110th Infantry Regiment were situated in the north central woods and the town in the south, while troops from the 2nd and 7th Regiments des Tiralleurs advanced eastward across the western front from north to south avoiding the open kill zone in the west central region. Elements of the 3rd Panzer Division formed a line along the railroad tracks creating a north-south Axis front line. Axis artillery fire began at 1730 hours, followed by two panzer platoons moving west along the road and an infantry push in the south. Heavy OBA continued to cause disruption and casualties on both sides, but by 1815 hours, the Germans had advanced to the east side of both wooded areas. From then on, the fighting was furious with repeated assaults, but the Allied units held and eventually repelled the Germans. Both sides received reinforcements at 1930 hours, and the French moved quickly to retake the central town. Fortunes then turned worse for the German forces, with an engineer platoon eliminated while trying to clear a mine field, and a deadly accurate French 20mm AA platoon causing casualties in two separate panzer units. The French/Moroccan line held strong, but did not actively pursue the harried German forces. Night came over the battlefield, and the French had vanquished the Axis, but the loss of Allied troops resulted in a draw.

This scenario is played over the halves of two maps, making for a small battlefield with plenty of engagement. Red Division Marocaine units from AP were used for all Moroccan forces, with French units for others.The objectives involve a combination of step loss and hex control (both town and woods) of 14 individual hexes west of the railroad line. Both sides start in strong defensive positions, but the location of most of the victory hexes lie in Allied territory, so the Germans have two options. They could hold back and try to hold the one town hex that they can place units in at the start of the game. However, the French have an OBA edge, a stronger mortar barrage group and aircraft on their first two turns, so trying to hold that hex for a draw is against the long-term odds. The other option is for the Germans to move forward, hoping not to incur greater than a 10-step loss (a minor French victory) and hold more objective hexes while eliminating more French units than they lose. The latter approach was used here, but the Germans ended up losing 29 steps to 19 for the French, and the French still controlled 9 hexes to the Axis total of 4, with one still contested. The French met the conditions for a “major” victory, and the Germans met them for a “minor” victory, so the battle ended in a draw.

0 Comments
You must be a registered member and logged-in to post a comment.
Stop us if you can
Author treadasaurusrex (Germany)
Method VASSAL
Victor Draw
Participants waynebaumber (AAR)
Play Date 2022-05-16
Language English
Scenario DiMa003

This was an epic 6-session play-through with the formidable, Wayne Baumber playing the French/Moroccan Commander. We used the optional smoke, consolidation and excess initiative rules and dispensed with the defense-favoring Fog of War rule -- much to the annoyance of my worthy opponent. Displaying more of his playful side than usual, my opponent called me all sorts of names even while we were setting up, and surprised us both by selecting the attacking French side on the basis of a die roll.

I say attacking, since the Germans seized the initiative at the outset and aggressively advanced both left and right flanks of the weaker German force past the north-south railroad and onto the western portion of the map. This allowed the rapid occupation of all the town hexes west of the railroad line on both maps 31 and 32, and created a small maneuver area, and kill zone, in the center of the combined map boards. Some noisy feints by the German’s light panzer company, helped lure the single French 47mm APX, AT gun and a strong ESC platoon to deploy too far forward, where they were both subsequently destroyed by accurate German OBA and HMG fire. By the end of the second game turn there were already 4 French step loses. This was barely accomplished before the French right (southern) flank advanced en masse to give the Germans a scenario-long costly lesson in cold steel close assault tactics in the vicinity of the southern town. During the second session, the French expanded their close assaults to the center of the battlefront, while the Germans mounted a 2-company probe on the north margin of the northernmost hill in the NW corner of the map. This action attracted the majority of my wily opponent’s available reserves during our 3rd session (game turns 4-7).

After the quite a bit of fumbling, the Germans slightly improved their odds in the two southern most assault hexes (Hexes 32-0406 town and 32-0507 adjacent woods) as they were able to support their sparse force with some light armor. Nevertheless, French/Moroccan elan was such that they pushed the German right flank hard, and in game turn 4 – and again in turn 10 – added an opportunistic probing attack in the center of the map trying to both take a town (Hex 0604) and get within spotting range of the north-south sunken railroad segment adjacent to the town. Fierce fighting ensued in this vicinity and both French probes were driven back. In game turn 7, a new center sector threat emerged as the French launched a central thrust with a reinforced company that waltzed across what turned out to be a decoy minefield and aimed their attack at the center town on the battle map (Hexes 32-0501 and 32-0601). This attack was beaten back by HMG and accurate German OBA fire. The final French AT gun was dispatched at the end of the 9th game turn, and their reinforcements were delayed two turns.

Eventually, the French came close to taking the sunken railway where the Germans had been taking advantage of their central position and the available roads to shuttle tanks and other units to threatened sectors and to reinforce their effort to hold the southern town (Hex 32-0406).

Both sides threw seven, 7-die combat rolls in the 2nd session and the Germans threw eight 7-die combat rolls in the subsequent session. During our final session, the Germans again threw seven 7-die combat rolls, to only 2 for the French side. As a result German OBA fire and adjacent-hes DF was notably inaccurate in game turns 13-15.

As the play-through wore on, French close assaults slowly collapsed in the north, in the face of reinforcing Axis armor and HMG units. However, the French made slow but steady progress in the south, and periodically threatened the center sector. By the end of our 4th session (game turns 8-10), French step losses were 21, and German were 13, hence the Germans had already eliminated sufficient French steps for a minor victory and had reclaimed several woods and hill hexes west of the railroad.

German armor-heavy reinforcement did not appear on time, but showed up on game turn 8. They strengthened the existing Germans flank attack in the north margin of the battle map.

In the end, elements of the German 3rd Panzer Division held slightly more town and woods hexes west of the crucial railroad right of way, resulting in a minor victory. However, the French had eliminated 23 German steps, while losing 39 of their own, and had a minor victory of their own.

As the German Commander had been playing for a draw from the beginning in this rather unbalanced scenario, against a numerically superior force with fine morale and enhanced initiative – it was a pleasant surprise when the French Commander Offered a draw during the 15th game turn.

As others have reported, this was a hard-fought, costly meeting engagement scenario for both sides, with many decision points and constricted room for maneuver. I give this very exciting and challenging scenario a solid 4.

0 Comments
You must be a registered member and logged-in to post a comment.
A worthy but bloody draw.
Author waynebaumber (France, Morocco)
Method VASSAL
Victor Draw
Participants treadasaurusrex (AAR)
Play Date 2022-05-16
Language English
Scenario DiMa003

Played over VASSAL in six two - three hour session this scenario has the Germans holding a sunken railway line against a horde of French colonial troops, the German have rather mediocre armour support with the French having even less armour support. The VC's favour the French in as much as they gain a major victory by eliminating German steps, the Germans have to gain ground west of the railway and inflict more casualties for their major victory. I had presumed that my honourable opponent would initially fight a defensive battle then counter attack when his reinforcements arrived bit I had underestimated Treadasaurusrex's thirst for glory. He launched a strong attack on my flanks which caught me on the hop, this coupled with his happy knack of rolling double 1 at the most inappropriate times had me reeling by GT6. However there came a slight lull in the German offensive as the efficient German artillery decided to concentrate on knocking out my A/T guns. This gave me the chance to regroup and counterattack launching a surprise attack through a dummy minefield, Felipe responded quickly and the attack was repulsed but at least I was finally making him react to my moves. I then attacked on both flanks and slowly pushed him back in the south while things got very bloody on the North . By GT 11 I eliminated enough steps for a major win, could I deny the Germans a major win as well by taking more town and wood hexes west of the railroad in the final few turns, further attacks in the south and centre initially gave me hope but French losses were now very heavy and these final attacks were unsupported and lacking in strength to eject the Boche from the towns they had taken in the first few turns. Solid scenario but lacking in much space for manoeuvre though, Felipe play an excellent game particularly at the start of the scenario and although he claims he was playing for a draw from the start I was very defiantly doing so in the middle stages. We fight on!

0 Comments
You must be a registered member and logged-in to post a comment.
Errors? Omissions? Report them!
Page generated in 0.685 seconds.