the Random Events table...

[Shad]

I haven't had this come up in my games too frequently, but the few times it has my (occasional) opponent and I always eagerly rolled on the table, despite knowing full well that the result could catastrophically change the battle.

I would never use it for competitive play, but if you're just having a friendly battle I enjoy the added element of surprise.

[awdougherty]

I haven't had this come up in my games too frequently, but the few times it has my (occasional) opponent and I always eagerly rolled on the table, despite knowing full well that the result could catastrophically change the battle.

I would never use it for competitive play, but if you're just having a friendly battle I enjoy the added element of surprise.

I voted Huh? only because I'm not at all averse to using them, I just haven't yet. Seems like it could make the games pretty fun.

[larry marak]

I like these tables, they only come into play rarely, and add a lot of variety to gaming situations. A good idea since way back then when the "Chance and Community Chest" article was published in the General for Panzerblitz.

[Poor Yorek]

"Nope, never" for me. I find more than sufficient randomness with the vagaries of the combat tables.

[vince hughes]

Never use em'

[PaperTiger]

I love adding the unforseeable to the mix.

[Fenrir]

I loved the Random Tables in the first PG-EF. In some of those infantry vs. infantry battles things can get really spicy when suddenly an armor/infantry kampfgruppe shows up or maybe a company of T-34s or both...

...good times!

[Matt W]

I enjoy the unpredictability of them. I had one scenario which combined with the random events table indicated that Romania got cold feet about crossing the Dniestr.

[upintheattic]

Fog of War rolls give me all the randomness I'm looking for. I might use the table to add extra replay value to a scenario I'd played before.

[GeneSteeler]

"Very Rarely"