Poll: Should they share the library entry?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes
0%
0 0%
No
100.00%
2 100.00%
Total 2 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
I abhor a distiction without a difference
06-03-2023, 12:22 AM,
#1
I abhor a distiction without a difference
I have swallows of Death in hand. Generally, it looks pretty good. Someday I will get it and the units into the library and into Vassal. The irritant is the Moroccan Tirailleurs.
They look like this:
[Image: NEW_1.jpg]
The Moroccan Escadrons look like this:
[Image: 1554-2.png]

I'm thinking they should share the same library slot, with appropriate heading changes.
Sonora, Tankodactyl, Schoenwulf And 1 others like this post
... More and more, people around the world are coming to realize that the world is flat! Winking
Reply
06-03-2023, 04:21 AM,
#2
RE: I abhor a distiction without a difference
If they are different in the scenarios' printed OOBs then they should be listed separately in the library, lazy artwork or not.
...came for the cardboard, stayed for the camaraderie...
Reply
06-03-2023, 07:38 AM,
#3
RE: I abhor a distiction without a difference
The Moroccan ESC pieces were published by AP at a time when they wanted them to be elite. As the only French elite units in Fall of France were ESC 4-3 units, the choice was obvious. However, the squadron (escadron) term is devoted to cavalry not to infantry (the equivalent is Company). I chose Tirailleurs (hence TIR) which is the proper term for African units.
Sonora, Tankodactyl, cjsiam And 1 others like this post
Reply
06-03-2023, 12:40 PM,
#4
RE: I abhor a distiction without a difference
Peter---first image did not come through--at least for me...
cjSmile
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)