05-21-2020, 11:11 AM,
|
|
plloyd1010
First Sergeant
|
Posts: 3,490
Threads: 358
Joined: Jun 2012
|
|
RE: LOS Question from Hill
- Yes. Per RaW there is line of sight.
- Yes, you did here of something else. Yes it was me.
This is the rule I created:
8.3.4 Presumed Crest Lines
The LOS between units of different elevations is blocked if the higher unit is behind the crest of the hill. If the highest unit has a higher elevation line behind it, which is also on the same hill, the units are in LOS of each other.
Not a perfect solution, but quite workable.
Keep in mind, if you are teaching someone the game, stay RaW.
... More and more, people around the world are coming to realize that the world is flat!
|
|
05-23-2020, 06:58 AM,
|
|
RE: LOS Question from Hill
(05-22-2020, 08:11 PM)leonard Wrote: Is the red arrow hex out of LOS ? I don’t think so. If the distance from the slope to the target is strictly less than the one from firer to slope, then it is blocked. No ??
To be honest, that is the one thing that popped out at me when I first read this thread.
Using rule 8.42, the Line of Sight is BLOCKED if both the spotting and target hex are on DIFFERENT elevations and (second bullet) – one or more slope hexes of the same elevation as the higher unit lies between the two hexes and the slope hex is closer (not equidistant) to the lower unit than the higher one.
In the present example, the one slope hex between the two hexes in question is a same level slope hex and it is equidistant to both hexes.
The second LOS example illustration in the rule book (near rule 8.46 in my copy) shows two similar situations (G-H and G-K). While the book didn't address the G-H LOS, the G-K LOS is specifically permissible in that hex 0908 in the example is equidistant to both hexes.
Peace. Michael
|
|
|