[PG-HQ Dev Blog] 2013 May Update

[Shad]

In other news, we will very shortly have support for Hammer & Sickle and Edelweiss IV should you seek to play them.

I still like the title Edelweiss - The Book, plus it should put it in the proper order on the Library's Games Page.

What if we changed Edelweiss - Expanded to be Edelweiss III? Then the relationships are crystal clear.

[rerathbun]

In other news, we will very shortly have support for Hammer & Sickle and Edelweiss IV should you seek to play them.

I still like the title Edelweiss - The Book, plus it should put it in the proper order on the Library's Games Page.

What if we changed Edelweiss - Expanded to be Edelweiss III? Then the relationships are crystal clear.

That works for me, anyone else have an opinion?

[Michael Murphy]

I'm good with Edelweiss III and Edelweiss IV although we might be better served by using numerals instead; (think Edelweiss 3 and Edelwiess 4). My issue here is that with this many iterations, we're running out of four character abbreviations for each version.

[plloyd1010]

Shouldn't the new Edelweiss be Edelweiss III? Edelweiss Exp. would be Edelweiss II

[rerathbun]

Shouldn't the new Edelweiss be Edelweiss III? Edelweiss Exp. would be Edelweiss II

See note on the 'box back' section of the Edelweiss Expanded page.

[plloyd1010]

Based on the 'box back' section, I would vote for Edelweiss - Book. Its predecessor would then remain Edelweiss - Expanded and the 'original' being simple Edelweiss. Otherwise leave out the I, II, III, & IV as they seem a bit muddled.