10-10-2012, 09:04 AM,
(This post was last modified: 10-19-2012, 07:46 PM by Shad.)
|
|
Shad
General of the Army
|
Posts: 2,249
Threads: 293
Joined: May 2012
|
|
[resolved] The Mouse that Roared <- include or not?
PG-HQ is my site in the sense that I pay the bills and do a lot of the work.
However, PG-HQ is your site in the sense that you use it, and without you using it there is no purpose for its existence.
Historically, I have been opposed to including Infantry Attacks items in the Library/PG-HQ.
But I'm willing to open this one up for discussion again, now that there is another product out there (and probably more in the future).
Hmm?
###################
Verdict:- Infantry Attacks maps 45 and 49 have been added to the PG-HQ Library
- consideration of further addition of non-PG materials put on hold until PG coverage hits 100%
We need to stay true to our roots and finish what we started before branching out. (we're about to be behind on games, we're way behind on counters)
...came for the cardboard, stayed for the camaraderie...
|
|
10-10-2012, 09:49 AM,
|
|
Matt W
Lieutenant Colonel
|
Posts: 1,037
Threads: 22
Joined: Jun 2012
|
|
RE: The Mouse that Roared <- include or not?
The maps have already been tapped for use in at least one supplement (Workers and Peasants) and I would expect similar types of crossovers in the future, in terms of odd connections. While I know that they are NOT the same game the components can be used and once they exist in more quantity, will be used in PG in the future.
While we know next to nothing (or at least some of us know next to nothing) about the Modern PG, I expect a similar type of crossover there with components able to be used across lines.
Ultimately those components will be used by others to create their own scenarios and having them available and catalogued in one place will be highly useful.
No "minor" country left behind...
|
|
|