06-25-2013, 07:46 AM,
|
|
warstudent
Recruit
|
Posts: 81
Threads: 14
Joined: Oct 2012
|
|
RE: Marine Platoon organization 1941-45
The D formation Marines did in fact have an extra BAR squad (with 2 BAR), so there were at least 5 BAR in the D formation of the Guadalcanal marines.
The ONLY way I can see the Guadal 6-3 marines going upto Saipan 10-3 is that the Guadal Marines didn't yet have the M1 garand and the value is calculated as
Guadalcanal marines mostly having Springfield Rifles & 5 BAR (possibly a 6th with platoon HQ)
Saipan marines 9 BAR & all the Springfields replaced by M1 garand.
warstudent aka Jim
|
|
06-25-2013, 07:59 PM,
|
|
warstudent
Recruit
|
Posts: 81
Threads: 14
Joined: Oct 2012
|
|
RE: Marine Platoon organization 1941-45
(06-25-2013, 08:28 AM)JayTownsend Wrote: Yeah most of the Marines that started on Guadalcanal with the M1903 Springfield.
The marines did try to get the Johnson semi-auto rifle into regular production but the Army killed it.The Para marines did end up using the ones that were made.
http://www.nps.gov/history/history/onlin...ganization
warstudent aka Jim
|
|
06-26-2013, 08:00 PM,
|
|
warstudent
Recruit
|
Posts: 81
Threads: 14
Joined: Oct 2012
|
|
RE: Marine Platoon organization 1941-45
Keep in mind that as the war progressed, US manufacturing went into full production. That full production meant more planes to degrade Japan's industrial base, and more subs to sink needed raw materials.
Japanese weapons equals if not surpasses weapons made by other participants of World War II," explains advanced Japanese militaria collector Jareth Holub. "It wasn’t until the very last two years, due to U.S. air strikes, that factories started producing sub par products." - See more at: http://www.armchairgeneral.com/weapons-f...xwqws.dpuf
warstudent aka Jim
|
|
06-27-2013, 04:11 AM,
|
|
plloyd1010
First Sergeant
|
Posts: 3,489
Threads: 357
Joined: Jun 2012
|
|
RE: Marine Platoon organization 1941-45
Quote:Japanese weapons equals if not surpasses weapons made by other participants
An interesting statement when you consider that everyone else seems to think Japanese rifles are crap, LMGs not much better, and pistols rather mediocre. Well, it is an ACG article quoting someone who sells that stuff.
On the other hand, the Springfield is still a credible gun among enthusiasts and everyone loves the M1 Garand. I've never heard anyone say anything bad about durability of them, or the British & German equivalents.
Don't forget that the Japanese had the "Bushido Spirit" doctrine for a reason, and went war with the U.S. because they didn't learn from experience or listen to those who knew better.
... More and more, people around the world are coming to realize that the world is flat!
|
|
|