07-25-2018, 09:20 PM,
|
|
Andreas
Private
|
Posts: 18
Threads: 6
Joined: Aug 2017
|
|
RE: Scenarios played, small & first?
I got a bad start in PG and recently decided to open a series of solo small-scenario playthroughs. I made a spreadsheet for EFD and RTB scenarios using PG HQ data with a presumed rating of playability for each scenerio equal to # of turns * # of units * # of maps.
On the third try I played Malaya Kaboshi (definitely a wrong spelling, BTW) from EFD and had a blast for a small, 476-rated scenario.
The Germans were singulary lucky to advance upon a city with a big functioning tank factory.
|
|
07-26-2018, 01:44 AM,
|
|
RE: Scenarios played, small & first?
I usually play in sequential order just to stay organized. Its nice when the scenarios are at least roughly in chronological order for this reason too.
I'm playing through AK and only have space for one map atm so I have to jump around a lot. That and the seemingly random scenario order makes my head hurt
|
|
07-26-2018, 09:37 PM,
|
|
Andreas
Private
|
Posts: 18
Threads: 6
Joined: Aug 2017
|
|
RE: Scenarios played, small & first?
(07-25-2018, 11:03 PM)Hugmenot Wrote: (Number of turns) x (Number of units) is what I used to select scenarios when I started playing PG. All other things being equal, the number of maps has very little influence on the playing time in my opinion.
Surely that makes sense but number of maps serves as a tiebreak between equally-rated scenarios and accounts for the chore of setting them properly.
The Germans were singulary lucky to advance upon a city with a big functioning tank factory.
|
|
|