Shad has improved the Additional Notes section so that multiple notes are separated as paragraphs. He's left it up to us whether the Kursk map substitution on
Scenario 43 should be an 'Additional Note' or an 'Erratum.'
I put it in Additional Notes, believing that there's nothing "wrong" with the scenario, it simply used the map that was available when it was published. That said, I have no problem moving it to the Errata if that's where most of us prefer it.
Any comments?
Also,
should I add the map note to the other scenarios around Voroshilova (scenarios 16, 18, 19 and 24). As Ottavio wrote in his
original post on the map substitutions, "That village is relevant but never key in those scenarios with the exception of [43], which focuses on the assault to the village."
