|
RE: SOI
Leonard,
For me, MW & IA, although both boasting the same 85-90%% of rules (estimated not scientifically calculated LOL) do still indeed represent different 'shelves' of the PG spawn.
I am keen to play a few IA games myself but will wait until it has its own section created (and would be willing to input the scenarios too to get it started). Got to get Wayne on board with this and encourage one or two plays out of him.
Of course they are the same family and understandably have a spot here as an off-shoot. But ultimately they are not the same departments and I am presuming that's why Shad is keeping them apart. From my learning of snippets that might be on the horizon, if Warsaw Pact and NATO are ever introduced in a 3WW type package from the 80's, then the weapon systems available will make MW a vastly different experience to play, no matter how the rules may be cut from the same hue (hew).
The other more basic but perhaps important matter is time available. Shad at present appears to prioritise what he tackles with the PG element at present Adding IA & MW might just be a bit too much work for now, though I believe a couple have offered to assist that have web skills ....................... My prediction ?............ In time, they will come. Save those AAR's in MS Word for now mon ami :-)
|
