Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[Rules] 8.4 Elevation makes no sense to me
02-27-2014, 08:15 AM,
#41
RE: 8.4 Elevation makes no sense to me
Hi Vince,

I have been following the discussion about the meaning of "Up to three offboard artillery factors may combine into one attack per action segment."

As the rule is written, I don't believe clearly it implies that only one artillery attack can be made in an action segment, but whatever - I'm not so interested in analyzing the grammar and semantics of the rule sentences as in knowing what the intended/official meaning of the rule is. Smile

So I bow to your experience. I also see some earlier comments in that OBA thread (e.g. http://www.pg-hq.com/comms/showthread.ph...96#pid2196 ) mentioning some older FAQ saying the OBA in one action must be combined, so OK, cool.

Thanks for your help!
Reply


Messages In This Thread
8.4 Elevation makes no sense to me - by russ - 02-24-2014, 09:32 PM
RE: 8.4 Elevation makes no sense to me - by Shad - 02-25-2014, 11:11 PM
RE: 8.4 Elevation makes no sense to me - by russ - 02-26-2014, 07:33 PM
RE: 8.4 Elevation makes no sense to me - by Shad - 02-26-2014, 10:50 PM
RE: 8.4 Elevation makes no sense to me - by russ - 02-27-2014, 06:30 AM
RE: 8.4 Elevation makes no sense to me - by russ - 02-27-2014, 07:49 AM
RE: 8.4 Elevation makes no sense to me - by russ - 02-27-2014, 08:15 AM
RE: 8.4 Elevation makes no sense to me - by russ - 02-27-2014, 08:42 AM
RE: 8.4 Elevation makes no sense to me - by russ - 02-27-2014, 05:29 PM
RE: 8.4 Elevation makes no sense to me - by russ - 02-27-2014, 07:25 PM
RE: 8.4 Elevation makes no sense to me - by russ - 02-28-2014, 01:09 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)