Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
'Controversial' View on Supplements Using Multi-Sets
11-06-2013, 04:36 AM, (This post was last modified: 11-06-2013, 04:36 AM by campsawyer.)
#13
RE: 'Controversial' View on Supplements Using Multi-Sets
(11-06-2013, 03:23 AM)larry marak Wrote: What do you call the behavior behind a disparity that large? Angry


I suspect the info on the cover of Secret Weapons was composed before finally development of the scenario book was completed. It is egregiously wrong. It could also be that Secret Weapons began life as a comb bound 10 scenario set with only those games drawn on, and morphed into a book.

Mind you, this is just devil's advocate on my part.

And as Jay can tell us all, what the designer submits is never exactly what the publisher releases.

Larry, all those reasons are excuses for poor QA of a product that goes out the door. No matter how something starts, it should cleanup up and egregious discrepancies should not exist.

Measure twice, cut once. I will take a simple carpenter over a devil's advocate any day Wink
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: 'Controversial' View on Supplements Using Multi-Sets - by campsawyer - 11-06-2013, 04:36 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)