Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
'Controversial' View on Supplements Using Multi-Sets
11-06-2013, 04:07 AM, (This post was last modified: 11-06-2013, 04:07 AM by larry marak.)
#12
RE: 'Controversial' View on Supplements Using Multi-Sets
As far as scenario books using multiple sets of counters are concerned as an old timer, I have no problem with them. At least we are seeing fewer scenarios requiring multiple copies of the same game to play. The record here is in Tank Battles, where FIVE sets of Heros or Red Warriors were needed to play one of the Mars scenarios.

However, the elimination of the comb bounds and some of the books with counters should make future supplement possibilities more constrained. For instance, Nihon Silk is already history, so books expanding actions in the Pacific or the Dutch East Indies may need a new source of counters. Likewise Blue Division, South Africa's War, White Eagles, etc.

Down the road, White Eagles will return as a boxed game, as will the Romanian trilogy, but many of the expansions we've played over the years will exist only on this website.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: 'Controversial' View on Supplements Using Multi-Sets - by larry marak - 11-06-2013, 04:07 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)