Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
AFV units with indirect fire or: what makes a tank a tank?
09-27-2013, 12:46 PM,
#12
RE: AFV units with indirect fire or: what makes a tank a tank?
Clarifying and summarizing what has gone before
  • Moves like transport type used in the portee configuration (We have ½track & PM portees.)
  • Cannot unload the gun
  • May not transport other units (presumably not leaders either)
  • Activated like transport, self, stack or infantry leader
  • Stack as a combat unit
  • Killed or otherwise affected by fire as per the transport armor type (-1 vs. AT fire if mount is a truck or unarmored PM)
  • Not eliminated as collateral damage
  • Not subject to loaded transport fire penalty
  • Armored portees are open topped

Treated as an exposed gun for DF & BF? I don't know, they seem to die fast enough. How long would you expect a truck portee to last in tank combat?

Now a monkey wrench: Can truck mounted portees dig in? They aren't transport anymore.
... More and more, people around the world are coming to realize that the world is flat! Winking
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: AFV units with indirect fire or: what makes a tank a tank? - by plloyd1010 - 09-27-2013, 12:46 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)