Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
AFV units with indirect fire or: what makes a tank a tank?
09-27-2013, 10:26 AM, (This post was last modified: 09-27-2013, 10:27 AM by rerathbun.)
#10
RE: AFV units with indirect fire or: what makes a tank a tank?
(09-27-2013, 10:13 AM)campsawyer Wrote: From the standpoint of combat it is a "combat unit" as it has some type of firepower. So in an assault it would need to be eliminated as 1,2,3 result and not as a transporting truck. When it comes to the +1 shift for AT/AA/ART that is a grey spot. I would give them the shift because they are exposed just like a gun. With the dugin, as they are a combat unit, they can digin.

I did extensive reading on Portees for the Armor Notes on PG-HQ, and I concur with Campsawyer. One thing to add: in assault, they have an assault combat strength of 1, per Rule 12.42

(Added note: I see Vince beat me to the punch)
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: AFV units with indirect fire or: what makes a tank a tank? - by rerathbun - 09-27-2013, 10:26 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)