Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[House Rules] Immobilizing AT Fire
08-08-2013, 11:07 PM,
#3
RE: Immobilizing AT Fire
Thanks for the feedback. Your comment on platoon v. individual is well noted. I had this discussion before with another person and hence the M check rather than a straight disruption for a result. The M check gives more seasoned tankers a chance to brush off a disabling effect, one tank losing a tread. But it does give the variabilty to having the platoon leaders tank temporarily disabled, which would stop the platoon and have them go in a defensive position while he sorts things out.


You can probably think of other reasons to, but more importantly thanks for giving it a try.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Immobilizing AT Fire - by campsawyer - 07-25-2013, 11:42 PM
RE: Immobilizing AT Fire - by rmakowsky - 08-08-2013, 09:17 PM
RE: Immobilizing AT Fire - by campsawyer - 08-08-2013, 11:07 PM
RE: Immobilizing AT Fire - by JayTownsend - 08-08-2013, 11:13 PM
RE: Immobilizing AT Fire - by Matt W - 08-08-2013, 11:35 PM
RE: Immobilizing AT Fire - by vince hughes - 08-08-2013, 11:59 PM
RE: Immobilizing AT Fire - by campsawyer - 08-09-2013, 05:11 AM
RE: Immobilizing AT Fire - by Hugmenot - 08-09-2013, 12:06 AM
RE: Immobilizing AT Fire - by campsawyer - 08-09-2013, 05:15 AM
RE: Immobilizing AT Fire - by Matt W - 08-09-2013, 12:32 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)