PG-HQ Forums › Panzer Grenadier › General Discussion v
[resolved] The Mouse that Roared <- include or not?

Poll: Should Infantry Attacks games be featured alongside PG series games on PG-HQ?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes, include them.
66.67%
 12 66.67%
No, they are and should remain separate.
33.33%
 6 33.33%
Total 18 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Closed 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
[resolved] The Mouse that Roared <- include or not?
10-16-2012, 12:30 AM,
#14
larry marak Offline
Recruit
*****
 		Posts: 1,343
Threads: 194
Joined: May 2012
RE: The Mouse that Roared <- include or not?
Second thoughts. Any maps from I.A. and MPG which are later used in PG scenarios become ipso facto PG maps and definitely should be included.

The big questionmark to me is what types of manmade terrain will be represented on MPG maps...Iraqi triangular berm forts, major paved airfields, power installations might not port well to the 1933-48 era, depending on how they're done. Hydro-electric plants work well for MPG and WW2 but not WW1, etc.

Ideally all 3 systems should be housed together, maybe in different halls of the library. I.A. is PG in a slightly different era. Modern PG is still an unknown.
Find
Thread Closed 


Messages In This Thread
RE: The Mouse that Roared <- include or not? - by larry marak - 10-16-2012, 12:30 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)