|
RE: Crossfire PingPong -- 2 Questions
Oh brother . . .
If this is the way it is to be officially interpreted by the rules lawyers, then it is indeed time to create another house rule deleting the ridiculous second sentence located on page 25, in 11.12, under Anti-Tank Fire.
Tubac52's and the T-Rex's views are realistic in this situation. A targeted platoon of AFVs once shot at by an AT weapon system should remain in a "crossfire" situation for other AT weapon-carrying units with the correct angles for the balance of the turn.
|