Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Stanardizing the map extensions
09-04-2024, 05:20 AM,
#2
RE: Stanardizing the map extensions
(09-04-2024, 04:38 AM)plloyd1010 Wrote: The next cleanup project for PG Uber is a quick one, Standardizing map listing and nomenclature.

First question, Map or Board? Map or mapboard is standard on the APL pages. Sometimes the term board gets used. So it's a question.

Group maps (or boards) by reference or orientation. That is to say, should they be?
    Map 01
    Map 02
    Map 01 - 90°
    Map 02 - 90°
Or?
    Map 01
    Map 01 - 90°
    Map 02
    Map 02 - 90°

Last what should the orientation nomenclature be? Right now it is a combination of 90° or Rotated, with the map number being in the lower left and the hex grain running horizontally. Should the orientation reference be
  1. Vert/Horiz,referring to hex gain
  2. 90°, with the number in the lower left
  3. Rotated, again with the number in the lower left
  4. something else?
Anyone have any thoughts?
Thanks Peter,

My vote is for calling them all, "Map" and using the terms: "landscape" or "portrait," and "rotated" as appropriate, for sake of clarity. 

I assume that we are keeping the "flip" option for map setup, que no?
Reconquista, Tambu, ACav And 7 others like this post
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Stanardizing the map extensions - by plloyd1010 - 09-04-2024, 04:38 AM
RE: Stanardizing the map extensions - by treadasaurusrex - 09-04-2024, 05:20 AM
RE: Stanardizing the map extensions - by Shad - 09-05-2024, 12:34 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 11 Guest(s)