BM-13, I'll probably do it anyway, but...

[plloyd1010]

We always butt heads on this as we have fundamentally opposed views on what the Site and the Modules should be representing. I hope you don't take it personally, because I really do appreciate all the hard work and effort that you have put into all of this. If its a huge undertaking to add an alternate image don't worry about. Heck, by the time its done, I'll most likely be done with Tank Battles and might be the only one who cares enough to use the darn thing anyway.

Of course we do, and with some others as well. That's kind of where the fun is. I expect our differences have more to do with how we view the games as opposed to the site.

PG is a very solid though imprecise game system and the scenarios are quite robust in their balance (for good or ill). Most retroactively applied developments have little significance due to the inherent granularity of the system and that robustness. There are exceptions of course, the Italian machine-guns for example.

I think the site was made for arguments like this. Judging from the lack of other responses and side input, I surmise that no one else cares about this argument, or my initial question about the BM-13 status.