Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
BM-13, I'll probably do it anyway, but...
02-03-2023, 03:35 AM,
#4
RE: BM-13, I'll probably do it anyway, but...
(02-03-2023, 03:24 AM)plloyd1010 Wrote:
(02-03-2023, 02:32 AM)triangular_cube Wrote: You can name names  Winking

Okay Mr. P,
First there 127 scenarios where BM-13's appear. Of those 29 are prior to the release of Road to Berlin. Then there are the 9 from Red Warriors, which reuses the HotSU countersheet, so I need to squint a bit there to find that acceptable. (Sort of like when APL reprinted mistakes from EFDx in FitS and ARom.) That leaves a comparison of 29 to 98 of the old vs. new appearances, 38 to 89 with the RedW squint.
 
(02-03-2023, 02:32 AM)triangular_cube Wrote: We had a similar issue with the Italian HMG unit that occaisionally has 7-4 strength but predominantly has a 6-4 strength. After bugging you about it you gave me the 6-4 image   Smile .

And as I said. I will likely do the same thing here. Are you going to try to get alternates for the PzIVe now? Aint gonna happen. The P51/F51 question has an 8 point margin in favor of the F51. It might just pass.

If you mix in the Guards BM-13 sure? This is about the RKKA BM-13. These are game pieces, not real trucks. 

I haven't asked for an alternate IVe, although I do use the old values in the appropriate modules. I spoke in favor of your proposed P51/F51 change, so I really don't know what your throwing that in for.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: BM-13, I'll probably do it anyway, but... - by triangular_cube - 02-03-2023, 03:35 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)