Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
BM-13, I'll probably do it anyway, but...
02-03-2023, 02:32 AM,
#2
RE: BM-13, I'll probably do it anyway, but...
You can name names  Winking

My point of contention with the RKKA BM-13 is that 38/53 scenarios in which it appears either A) Came with the range 21 piece directly in the module, or B) Only had the range 21 piece in existence at the time. 

If the majority of its usage is a range 21 piece it makes sense to me to have an alternate image available so that when playing "authentically" we don't have to remember the difference. I would say for "balance" sake, but... after making it 65% of the way through Tank Battles I can assure you these MARS scenarios were never tabled prior to publishing, let alone playested. 

We had a similar issue with the Italian HMG unit that occaisionally has 7-4 strength but predominantly has a 6-4 strength. After bugging you about it you gave me the 6-4 image   Smile .

Its not like im asking for the true anachronisms, like the 0-0 RKKA 45mm (which i do play with in the older stuff, but would feel silly asking for).
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: BM-13, I'll probably do it anyway, but... - by triangular_cube - 02-03-2023, 02:32 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)