Craig, I have no particular problem with being wrong, it's happened once or twice before.
That is why there is a quarterly update plan. My issue has more to do with APL's systemic inconsistency.
The Sd.Kfz. 7 is armored, why? Because the cab is armored (but passengers not protected).
Okay... The Bufla has an armored cab and engine, so it should be armored like the Sd.Kfz. 7, right? Nope. Why?
Btw: The Sd.Kfz. 7/2 is armored, right? Nope. Why? Did they take armor off the cab (which was the justification for its armor rating)? Uhhhh....
The Sd.Kfz. 10/4 should be unarmored. Why yes it is, except for in KurS and occasional games afterward. Why? Because some late war Sd.Kfz. 10's had armored cabs. Oh, in light of the Sd.Kfz. 7/2 and Bufla, what does an armored cab have to do with it?
Because that is how we made the counter!
Yeah, right... The gods have spoken, not thought much, but spoken.
I can, and probably should, change the Vassal piece.
P.S. I have also been previously informed that a double-positive cannot result in a negative.
Bufla--The Anomaly of the Fall of France ...
