(03-08-2022, 01:13 AM)plloyd1010 Wrote: The origin comment is mostly correct. The problem is again a rules definition.
In the 4th edition it isn't a write-up it's a rule. Specifically page 10 3.3" down on the left side of the page, second paragraph of the rule. The write-up is from the 3rd edition question, answered by someone at APL at the time, I think it was Doug McNair.
Quote:Now we are potentially expanding that to include bridges as well?
Are we? My question is about the relevancy of artwork, specifically declared to be irrelevant.
Quote:This is also a further distortion of using modern rule sets to play older scenarios that were not "balanced" (in quotes for obvious reasons) with their use in mind. Especially when it comes to terrain.
Is it? Is not Fall of France a 4th edition game? BtW: Map 30 has been used in 26 scenarios, not 2. You can make it 27 if you want to count the Division Marocain scenario where it is used.
Now none of that has forwarded the discussion and understanding as to bridge artwork in towns, or it's implication as bridges as a victory component. Shall we get back to that now? Cjsaim and I have fight scheduled.
So what is your question then? Because it seems to everyone answering this thread that you are asking if bridges exist when sitting in towns. Seeing as you do not believe discussing the conditions surrounding said bridges and the rules applying to them are forwarding the discussion, what are you hoping to get out of this thread?
Fall of France was developed and published with 3rd edition. 4th was first published with Burning Tigers, although the argument could be made that those few modules directly proceeding that were developed for 4th that doesnt apply here. Hence 2 scenarios being developed and published after 4th edition with map 30 involved. As stated, you are going to have distortions, especially terrain related when you port in new rules into old scenarios. If you are changing rules you need to translate the VCs to go along with them.
