Poll: What keeps you from playing a scenario the most?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Don't own the game.
22.50%
9 22.50%
Subject not interesting.
7.50%
3 7.50%
Too large (Maps/Counters/Turns)
30.00%
12 30.00%
No Time.
30.00%
12 30.00%
Just a collector of games.
2.50%
1 2.50%
Other, please comment?
7.50%
3 7.50%
Total 40 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Unplayed scenarios in PG are the sadist thing!
01-16-2022, 04:26 AM, (This post was last modified: 01-16-2022, 04:32 AM by JayTownsend.)
#1
Unplayed scenarios in PG are the sadist thing!
So many scenarios go un-played. I am not talking about new games, as it takes players awhile to get to them but older games, that sit for years without many scenarios getting played. 1967: Sword of Israel for example. I thought by now every scenario would have been played. I played 9 of the scenarios and thought they were fun and a good break from WWII. I realize some supplements don't get played because they are not everyone's bag of tea. 

I won't play scenarios that have more than 4 maps, a few times I tired 6 maps but I have no space for them. Some scenarios I am just not interested in.

Land Battleships for example has two scenarios, one with 6 maps and one with 8 maps, so I doubt I ever play either of them. 

Sometimes it just the subject that keeps a scenario from being played. Not for me, I like all theaters of operations and all subjects but WWI isn't really big on my interest list for some reason.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Unplayed scenarios in PG are the sadist thing! - by JayTownsend - 01-16-2022, 04:26 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)