Redefining canon for Shermans

Poll: What should Sherman canon be? You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Armor 4 Shermans should be the new normal, backwards and forward.	15.38%	2	15.38%
Armor 4 Shermans unbalance things too much, leave them in "Specials".	7.69%	1	7.69%
Armor values should vary by time period. (Please specify in a reply.)	53.85%	7	53.85%
Armor 4 should be standard with armor 3 as an alternate.	15.38%	2	15.38%
Armor 3 should be standard with armor 4 as an alternate.	7.69%	1	7.69%
Total		13 vote(s)	100%

* You voted for this item.

[Show Results]

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Thread Modes

Redefining canon for Shermans

08-23-2021, 07:11 AM,

#11

larrymm Offline

Recruit

Posts: 18
Threads: 2
Joined: Dec 2012

RE: Redefining canon for Shermans

An off-the-wall idea: perhaps the SWWAS approach to variant gunnery values could be used here, namely: for later scenarios, obtaining a hit against an original armor rating of "3" could then require a second, "confirming" die role that would lower the final odds to whatever was desired for the specific model/year/field mod, etc.

Find