Redefining canon for Shermans

Poll: What should Sherman canon be? You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Armor 4 Shermans should be the new normal, backwards and forward.	15.38%	2	15.38%
Armor 4 Shermans unbalance things too much, leave them in "Specials".	7.69%	1	7.69%
Armor values should vary by time period. (Please specify in a reply.)	53.85%	7	53.85%
Armor 4 should be standard with armor 3 as an alternate.	15.38%	2	15.38%
Armor 3 should be standard with armor 4 as an alternate.	7.69%	1	7.69%
Total		13 vote(s)	100%

* You voted for this item.

[Show Results]

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Thread Modes

Redefining canon for Shermans

08-22-2021, 01:26 PM,

triangular_cube Offline

Lieutenant Colonel

Posts: 405
Threads: 26
Joined: Dec 2016

RE: Redefining canon for Shermans

Those in favor of switching it up by year, how do you feel about the Soviet M4A2s?

These are specifically A2s, as opposed to the generic M4/Sherman units in other modules. By year of scenario they would be a 4, but by the actual tank identified on the counter they should remain a 3, no?

I certainly have some anxiety about losing access to the as published units. If they just get put into a different module, I can always load both. Alternate images one way or the other just seems, easier? to me and would allow everyone to grab the units they want.

Find