Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Question/Errata Spearhead #2 ??
02-08-2021, 09:59 AM,
#5
RE: Question/Errata Spearhead #2 ??
(02-08-2021, 01:39 AM)Poor Yorek Wrote: Re #1: the OBA in this scenario is 3x18 which would be consistent with the text referring to the M7.  I suspect that "M12" is just a typo, but as we have both noted, that change is a full col differential each time that unit would fire.  That being said, in Scenario #7, the US has a very large force including both an M7 and an M12.  The copious OBA (x6 factors in total) in that scenario are all '18' values.  The "ammo shortage" language is the same as in the others citing the OBA and/or the M7 (not the M12 explicitly).  I'm not well enough read to know whether US artillery ammunition shortages were specific to 105mm shot compared with 155mm or an editing issue that slipped through.
In the drive across France and the Hürtgen Forest battles, the SPA commanders had poor coordination with their supply trucks. This left stacks of ammunition in the wrong places and supply trucks catching up late. I am sure it applied to the M12's as well as the M7's.
... More and more, people around the world are coming to realize that the world is flat! Winking
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Question/Errata Spearhead #2 ?? - by Poor Yorek - 02-07-2021, 01:33 PM
RE: Question/Errata Spearhead #2 ?? - by plloyd1010 - 02-08-2021, 09:59 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)