Armor Immunity (7.25) Confusion

[saracv3]

Sounds like we’re saying the same thing. I don’t think an AFV can take a direct X, buf a build up of wounds, so to speak, can do it in. Failure of morale checks in various ways can cause step loss. And this can be caused by Direct Fire. But 7.25 makes a different statement in saying that armor can never be harmed...” Maybe I’m being a rules lawyer here.

FitS #21 is a great test of this rule. Benninghof writes (I’m assuming he’s the author) in the conclusion of the battle that German 105mm howitzers were quite effective against even T34s. Eyewitness accounts by Russian tank crews say that turrets and tracks could not withstand the 105s (there are four batteries in the scenario ) . Hulls however, were not penetrated.
I