PG-HQ Forums › Panzer Grenadier › PG-HQ Q&A v
Regarding inclusion of IA and MW

Poll: (Please read the post below before answering this poll!) Your preferred method of IA & MW treatment is:
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
They should be ignored completely. PG-HQ is for PG.
13.33%
 6 13.33%
They should have separate data and visually distinct color schemes (PG-HQ & IA-HQ & MW-HQ)
15.56%
 7 15.56%
They should be included within PG-HQ but the data and statistics should be separate (three Libraries)
53.33%
 24 53.33%
We should expand "PG" to include all 3 series, and all data and stats are unified (so Top 20 scenarios might include scenarios from all 3 games)
17.78%
 8 17.78%
Total 45 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Regarding inclusion of IA and MW
04-26-2018, 09:01 PM,
#14
plloyd1010 Offline
First Sergeant
*****
 		Posts: 3,489
Threads: 357
Joined: Jun 2012
RE: Regarding inclusion of IA and MW
I got the countries in a while back, but hit a snag with adding the top-level force. I informed Drew, but he (and ) have been sort of busy. Counter images for most of IA & MW are ready to go. Not sure were scenario info would go.
... More and more, people around the world are coming to realize that the world is flat! Winking
Website Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Regarding inclusion of IA and MW - by Shad - 08-03-2014, 10:52 PM
RE: Regarding inclusion of IA and MW - by Shad - 04-26-2018, 12:55 PM
RE: Regarding inclusion of IA and MW - by Shad - 04-26-2018, 10:31 PM
RE: Regarding inclusion of IA and MW - by plloyd1010 - 04-26-2018, 09:01 PM
RE: Regarding inclusion of IA and MW - by saracv3 - 10-01-2018, 08:41 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)