PG-HQ Forums › Panzer Grenadier › General Discussion v
Starting with the first scenario or not?

Poll: When getting a new PG game which scenario do you play first?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
The First one, just because you like to go in order?
13.89%
 5 13.89%
How many maps are use/space because of space issues?
11.11%
 4 11.11%
Scenario Length, number of turns?
13.89%
 5 13.89%
The number of counters used in a scenario?
8.33%
 3 8.33%
The one that interest you the most?
25.00%
 9 25.00%
One with the most unique mix of counter types?
2.78%
 1 2.78%
Type of scenario, like: INF vs INF, ARM vs. ARM, Amphibious and so on?
5.56%
 2 5.56%
Other?
19.44%
 7 19.44%
Total 36 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Starting with the first scenario or not?
02-16-2016, 01:09 AM,
#8
Coniglius Offline
Sergeant
***
 		Posts: 216
Threads: 25
Joined: Mar 2015
RE: Starting with the first scenario or not?
I'm with mwalbion, I like to play in chronological order. I have mapped out every scenario by date on a spreadsheet so that I can sort by the appropriate category. Hopeless but not Serious has the earliest scenarios dating back to 1934 (and one from CoE as well). Where I get into a little bit of head scratching is with the hypothetical scenarios because they typically have a month and year, but no day, so I have to fit them in wherever they make sense.

This only works when I'm playing solo by the way... when I play with my dad, it's whatever he wants to play (usually something on the eastern front) and I recently played a E.Ridge scenario via Vassal, but when I'm playing solo, I like to follow some date order, as I am doing with CoE currently.
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Starting with the first scenario or not? - by Coniglius - 02-16-2016, 01:09 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)