Logistic shortfall shit

[leonard]

In development we couldn't use a rule like this unless, as Vince mentioned, it is included in the SSRs as reflective of a situational reality.  The mere existence of such a possibility means that the side suffering the shortfall is likely to lose and that is way too much weight on a single die roll.

The rule is indeed quite handy to include as a scenario special rule when history calls for short ammunition or logistic problems. Not in every scenario !
Vince: it is true that it seems completely silly to use"logistic shortfall" in the big scenarios but even in medium size scenarios, it is far too present.
Among the set of Optional rules, it is unfortunately the only one to be out of scope.