Crossfire and Assault

[upintheattic]

As an aside, Doug, why wasn't the AT table configured like the DF or BF tables to account for the probability?

AT fire is different because it's one unit's fire value going up against another unit's armor value. You don't get that with DF and BF, where all that matters is total firepower directed at a hex and the characteristics of the units in that hex have no bearing on the result rolled on the table. So it wouldn't make sense to put AT fire on the same type of table as DF and BF.