Bad scenario design

[campsawyer]

Other players liked it while I found it to be so unbalanced I consider it broken. So who's right?

It will also depend upon whether they are solo or two-person played. Some scenarios play quite fine solo if you are the attacker, but are bad if played with two people. There are the ones where one player bangs up against the other with some bad VC's while the defender just "pass" or take important shots. From a solo perspective, one might like it for historical or for learning the game, but for the two players it just might be boring for them and get a lower rating. Point being is that Hugmenot's question is valid, who is right? The solo player that liked it or the head to head players that didn't. The ratings, although not perfect, give the first indication, but then I read on to the AAR's to find out the details.