Regarding inclusion of IA and MW

Poll: (Please read the post below before answering this poll!) Your preferred method of IA & MW treatment is: You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
They should be ignored completely. PG-HQ is for PG.	13.33%	6	13.33%
They should have separate data and visually distinct color schemes (PG-HQ & IA-HQ & MW-HQ)	15.56%	7	15.56%
They should be included within PG-HQ but the data and statistics should be separate (three Libraries)	53.33%	24	53.33%
We should expand "PG" to include all 3 series, and all data and stats are unified (so Top 20 scenarios might include scenarios from all 3 games)	17.78%	8	17.78%
Total		45 vote(s)	100%

* You voted for this item.

[Show Results]

Thread Rating:

1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Thread Modes

Regarding inclusion of IA and MW

01-01-2015, 11:52 PM,

warstudent Offline

Recruit

Posts: 81
Threads: 14
Joined: Oct 2012

RE: Regarding inclusion of IA and MW

Before adding those games and their extensive info into the database, maybe an addition on the profile page's "Your Collection" that includes the current IA and Modern PG games?

This would provide a way of judging how many members actually own and are interested in them.

Of course the inclusion would need to be heavily highlighted so that everybody would know they could be added to their collection. Maybe a checkbox to indicate you don't have any IA or Modern PG titles also?

warstudent aka Jim

Find