PG-HQ Forums › Panzer Grenadier › PG-HQ Q&A v
Regarding inclusion of IA and MW

Poll: (Please read the post below before answering this poll!) Your preferred method of IA & MW treatment is:
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
They should be ignored completely. PG-HQ is for PG.
13.33%
 6 13.33%
They should have separate data and visually distinct color schemes (PG-HQ & IA-HQ & MW-HQ)
15.56%
 7 15.56%
They should be included within PG-HQ but the data and statistics should be separate (three Libraries)
53.33%
 24 53.33%
We should expand "PG" to include all 3 series, and all data and stats are unified (so Top 20 scenarios might include scenarios from all 3 games)
17.78%
 8 17.78%
Total 45 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Regarding inclusion of IA and MW
08-05-2014, 03:14 AM,
#4
larry marak Offline
Recruit
*****
 		Posts: 1,343
Threads: 194
Joined: May 2012
RE: Regarding inclusion of IA and MW
Army duck has it right. I.A. is almost PG light, at least in unit differentation. MPG can be expected to be more complicated.
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Regarding inclusion of IA and MW - by Shad - 08-03-2014, 10:52 PM
RE: Regarding inclusion of IA and MW - by larry marak - 08-05-2014, 03:14 AM
RE: Regarding inclusion of IA and MW - by Shad - 04-26-2018, 12:55 PM
RE: Regarding inclusion of IA and MW - by Shad - 04-26-2018, 10:31 PM
RE: Regarding inclusion of IA and MW - by saracv3 - 10-01-2018, 08:41 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)