02-01-2014, 03:10 AM,
(This post was last modified: 02-01-2014, 03:11 AM by campsawyer.)
|
|
campsawyer
First Lieutenant
|
Posts: 1,023
Threads: 34
Joined: May 2012
|
|
RE: "Invasion of Germany" query
(02-01-2014, 12:24 AM)Poor Yorek Wrote: Quote:The scenarios themselves I think indicate where the counter-mix is taken from.
Leftenant, Sir, the record is disjointed! For example, IoG3/NoEl1 and IoG8/NoEl3 mention neither Cassino nor Airborne in the Scenario "Notes" as sources for the strongpoints. Oddly enough, IoG19/NoEl5 and IoG14/NoEl9 cite Edelweiss as the strongpoint source.
For IoG10/NoEl5, the original "notes" are explicit regarding Airborne but change in IoG to Edelweiss. Go figure.
The original NoEl SSR 15 explicitly cites Airborne
With the new IoG it seems that the default is intended to be Cassino, but there is still a mixture of citations in the individual scenarios (I do not own either Airborne or Eidelweiss so it is unclear to me what is distinctive regarding their strongpoint mix).
Quote:You might even find that as you use each scenario yourself.
We E-8's have been known to be taught to read. My post was based on having played through NoEl using the original supplement and, now, comparing with the new IoG.
I would cite this a a result of the disjointed development with PG scenarios. The designer goes though some sort of build, but then it is submited and the developer works in his thoughts, then APL edits after that. All done in a communications vacuum. We see the end result and correct/compensate.
|
|
02-01-2014, 10:46 AM,
|
|
RE: "Invasion of Germany" query
(02-01-2014, 08:10 AM)vince hughes Wrote: I think the simplest answer as to why the different strongpoints originally is probably because M.Benninghof designed NoE and used Airbornse s/points and M.Perryman designed the other 4 sets of 10 and used Cassino s/points.
How that all got muddled up with creation of IoG and also then got to include Edelweiss s/points ? I'll leave that to others to ponder :-)
Not much to ponder here old chap , AP are more concerned with cash flow than production vlaues. Shame really as its such a good game system.
|
|
|