Messed up (again!)

[Grognard Gunny]

In my AARs, solo play, I need to have the listing for Armata Romana #5 Reservist Nightmare relisted as #4 Crossed Sabers. The #5 listed in shared play is correct. (Do NOT fix or otherwise disturb!) I may have punched in the wrong Nr. when writing. Que Sera.

GG

[Grognard Gunny]

Incidentally, my AARs in the head to head listings should be. Unknown; 1 win, 1 loss, 0 ties, 2 total, with 0 net. Treadasaurusrex; 6 wins, 8 losses, 3 ties, 17 total, with -2 net. (Just in case anyone is keeping score!)

GG

[Reconquista]

In my AARs, solo play, I need to have the listing for Armata Romana #5 Reservist Nightmare relisted as #4 Crossed Sabers. The #5 listed in shared play is correct. (Do NOT fix or otherwise disturb!) I may have punched in the wrong Nr. when writing. Que Sera.

GG

I think that you can just delete that mistaken AAR yourself, as I hav done in the past. I would open it and save the text and then creat a new AAR with the correct scenario number. The first report you wrote for AR-05 seems to be just fine.

[Grognard Gunny]

Ok, managed to straighten out my AAR problem. I cancelled the wrongfully numbered AAR and rewrote it with the correct number... alas, my written report was not as elegant as my first edition. Oh well. Now all that remains is my never ending problem with my head to head stats.

GG

[Tankodactyl]

Incidentally, my AARs in the head to head listings should be. Unknown; 1 win, 1 loss, 0 ties, 2 total, with 0 net. Treadasaurusrex; 6 wins, 8 losses, 3 ties, 17 total, with -2 net. (Just in case anyone is keeping score!)

GG

Wow! Great results when playing the very dangerous and hard to beat, T-Rex!

I envy your 6 wins and 3 ties, with a guy who likes his tanks as much as I do.

Sure hope that the PG-HQ guys staighten out the head to head record, soon. Your public results will inspire other gamers to try their luck against my old Boss and other serious players in cyberspace.

[Miguelibal]

Plus, a lack of rules lawyers as live opponents means more fun and way less angst and fuss about the disorganized and poorly-written 4th edition rule book.

[Tambu]

True that!

[Shad]

Plus, a lack of rules lawyers as live opponents means more fun and way less angst and fuss about the disorganized and poorly-written 4th edition rule book.

By all means suggest clarifications or corrections so we can update our Annotated Rules here on the site.

[Tambu]

Hard to know where to start -- as you know, there are so many items requiring clarification and better examples.

Has the T-Rex, Daedalus, goose brown, or NBGB provided you with the set of house rules that they've been testing and assembling over the last 2+ years? They are more realistic and easier to use, for example: moving armor or infantry on roads at 1/2 MP per hex, not at 2/3 like in the 4th edition rules, is much simpler.

If not, I can attach a pdf copy of their last set of house rules to this note . . . if I knew how.

[Shad]

I've seen them mentioned in places, but house rules are not the same as clarifications.