Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
PG Games we DON'T want to see
01-22-2013, 05:28 AM,
#21
RE: PG Games we DON'T want to see
(01-22-2013, 03:11 AM)Michael Murphy Wrote: Don't forget to include the original Squad Leader. If you looked closely you could see the off-duty contingent playing SL on the messdecks. In fact, I occasionally saw our messdecks overrun with wargamers as well.
I remember that!
Reply
01-23-2013, 12:55 AM,
#22
RE: PG Games we DON'T want to see
I can't remember whether it was Victory or SPI, but The Final Countdown has been done as a scenario once before. Cone of Fire includes a Argentine carrier with jet fighters fighting a naval campaign in the mid 50's, so we could actually see this kind of scenario with existing SSWAS components. Call it a new Straits of Magellan scenario.
Reply
01-23-2013, 08:21 AM, (This post was last modified: 01-23-2013, 08:21 AM by wleonard1.)
#23
RE: PG Games we DON'T want to see
The PG Game I don't want to see? France 1939 - The Sitzkrieg.
First time in the PG series one player has a negative initiative rating. Lots of unique fortresses and heavy artillery that are never used.....
Reply
01-23-2013, 09:54 AM,
#24
RE: PG Games we DON'T want to see
Excellent proposal. Lots of Ft-17 platoons, and Pz1 tankettes :-}.
Reply
01-25-2013, 06:39 AM,
#25
RE: PG Games we DON'T want to see
The 4 map behemoths would be a blast also! All four maps place short-side to short side, so the play area is 11"x 68", All Germans set up on the long-side of the map at the top, French place all their fortresses and twice as many troops on the long-side of the map at the bottom. German Decisive victory is if they exit all their troops across their map in 10 turns.
Reply
01-25-2013, 07:00 AM,
#26
RE: PG Games we DON'T want to see
Indeed. An interesting monster that no-one would buy! How about a Rhineland intervention game,? say 20 scenarios, and lots of mid 30's equipment, Belgium and France vs Germany?
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)