08-29-2018, 12:23 AM,
|
|
RE: Scenarios played, small & first?
The first scenario that I play is the the one I like the look of most of all normally. I enjoy looking through the scenario books and choosing the best looking scenario to play next. This would normally not be a small scenario.
|
|
09-13-2018, 07:57 AM,
|
|
saracv3
Sergeant
|
Posts: 398
Threads: 53
Joined: Jun 2013
|
|
RE: Scenarios played, small & first?
I decided to hang on to Restistance. Too good to part with.
I'm still looking to play AFV v. AFV and a monster. I'm thinking 4+ boards and a classic panzer div. v. tank div. Eastern Front, 100+ counters, 30+ turns. Saw a 250+ counter, 4 board whopper in March on Lenin. yesterday. BTW, there's a lot more to Kursk: SF than II SS Panzer Corps I would think. Or, it seems the scenarios have been scaled down. Where's the monster within the monster, Prokhorovka? I see many references, but am not sure which scenario could be called the meat
of t he battle. Possibly I'll do little research and maybe come away with a Matt Ward type campaign.
|
|
09-14-2018, 03:12 AM,
|
|
cjsiam
Corporal
|
Posts: 683
Threads: 78
Joined: Jun 2018
|
|
RE: Scenarios played, small & first?
I've run into a Barbarossa Miniatures campaign which runs from June-Sept of 41 by Andrew Rolph...It is based on a Platoon based unit stand, and I think would fit really well with the PG platform....whole series of battles strung together in a campaign....
I'm looking at the maps---how to use a PG map set, or custom to make it work...the battles are Regiment to couple regiment sized...Russians are Randomized formations....pretty nice set up...
Turning it into a PG based campaign for Barbarossa, potentially multi-player, is where I'm looking to go with it.
https://www.wargamevault.com/product/241...n-the-Door
|
|
|