PG-HQ Forums
AK #32 OOB query - Printable Version

+- PG-HQ Forums (https://www.pg-hq.com/comms)
+-- Forum: Panzer Grenadier (https://www.pg-hq.com/comms/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Panzer Grenadier Rules (https://www.pg-hq.com/comms/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Thread: AK #32 OOB query (/showthread.php?tid=684)



AK #32 OOB query - Poor Yorek - 01-02-2014

Submitted to the errata, but thought to raise here as well:

For Scenario #32 (p. 30) should the INF & HMG in this scenario's OOB be BERS counters, not regular troops? Note the identification of the unit as V/8th Bersaglieri Battalion (p. 30). Also note, for example, Scenario 36 which identifies the III/8th Bersaglieri Battalion and does cite BERS/BERS MG units in the OOB. Likewise, Scenario 40 (also from the Ariete division). Just seems more consistent with other scenarios that the foot units in #32 should be BERS.

Think I'll play it that way in any case. Might be interesting to compare with outcomes of previous AARs.


RE: AK #32 OOB query - plloyd1010 - 01-02-2014

Yes for scenario 32. They are noted that way in my copy of the scenario book.

Scenario 36 has bersagliari and line infantry. I would use AK leaders for the bersagliari and DR leaders for the line infantry 9even though they are from the Trento division).

The scenario 40 infantry would be from the 8th Bersagliari regiment.


RE: AK #32 OOB query - Poor Yorek - 01-02-2014

(01-02-2014, 09:44 AM)plloyd1010 Wrote: Yes for scenario 32. They are noted that way in my copy of the scenario book.

Interesting. So they caught that for later printings. My printing, for example, has 9xINF; 2xHMG (not 9xBERS; 2xBERS MG).

Quote:Scenario 36 has bersagliari and line infantry.

Yes, mine does as well. This is partly why I thought (my) Sc 32 must have been an error.

Thanks for the verification.

PY