+- PG-HQ Forums (https://www.pg-hq.com/comms)
+-- Forum: Panzer Grenadier (https://www.pg-hq.com/comms/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: General Discussion (https://www.pg-hq.com/comms/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Thread: Another PoE problem. (/showthread.php?tid=350)
Another PoE problem. - plloyd1010 - 11-08-2012
Shouldn't the OT130[attachment=230], really be a OT-26?
And look like this:[attachment=231]
RE: Another PoE problem. - larry marak - 11-08-2012
Why? The OT-130 replaced the OT-26 in 1933, though I have no idea what the active service life was of either model. I do know that the OT-130 used a larger turret than the OT-26.
RE: Another PoE problem. - plloyd1010 - 11-08-2012
3 reasons:
1. The scenario book calls for OP-26's.
2. The OOBs I've seen many references to the OT-26, few OT-130's. There do not seem to have been very many present for these battles.
3. Flamethrower tanks should have red DF values.
P.S. The OT-26 and HT-26 are synonymous.
RE: Another PoE problem. - JayTownsend - 11-08-2012
Most likely too late now as the Power of the East was a download supplement but this information on the AP.
RE: Another PoE problem. - larry marak - 11-08-2012
As Jay tried to type, pass the info on. PG Nomahan, the boxed game, is still on the boxed burner, and it why PotE isn't a candidate for laser treatment.